Proof! MANNY PACQUIAO NEVER WON 7 WORLD TITLES IN 7 DIVISIONS

you could say that.

4 would be a record for lineal titles.

 

:good this

 

Why does that matters? barrera relinquished the title and then fought pacman, if barrera would've kept the belt then pacman would've been 7 world champion, pac still beat'em any way, what's the point?

 

This is old news to the hardcore non-bias boxing fan:good

 

it doesn't matter what i think...THE FACT IS THERE ARE 4 RECOGNIZED MAJOR SANCTIONING BODIES...

WHAT ITHINK AND MY OPINION DOES NOT COUNT...IM BEING OBJECTIVE

ONLY 4 RECOGNIZED SANCTIONING BODIES ARE THE WBC, WBA, WBO, IBF..DONT AGREE WITH IT AS THEY ARE ALL CORRUPT BUT HEY...THOSE ARE THE ONES

AND AGAIN..U MAY NOT CHANGE YOUR ARGUMENT WHEN IT COMES TO THE RING BELTS IN COMPARISON WITH OTHER BELTS..BUT MANY OTHER *******S DO...THEY DISCREDIT FLOYD FOR GOING AFTER THE RING TITLE IN BALDOMIR BUT PRAISE PAC FOR WINNING IT AND DISCREDIT ABC TITLES AT THE SAME TIME..

WHAT IM SAYING IS YOUR OPINIONS DONT COUNT...ITS WHATS RECOGNIZED THAT DOES....AND FOR "OFFICIAL" REASONS U SHOULDN'T ADVERTISE A FAKE TITLE...

LMFAO..AND THE IBO TITLE AT 140...WOW...

WASN'T TALKING ABOUT FLOYD EITHER...U BROUGHT UP WHAT FLOYD SAID ABOUT THE RING AND GB...I COULD CARE LESS WHAT HE SAID..IM TALKING ABOUT WHAT IS RECOGNIZED AND THATS THAT..

AND WHEN FLOYD WON THE RING WW TITLE AND LB 4 LB TITLE GOLDEN BOY HAD NOT PURCHASED THE RING :deal

 

LMFAO..******* QUOTE OF THE WEEK....BUT HE DIDN'T U DUMMY...

"SO IF ZAB JUDAH WOULDA PUT ALL HIS TITLES UP WITH BALDOMIR WHEN BALDOMIR BEAT HIM AND NOT JUST THE WBC THAN FLOYD WOULDA BEEN ALMOST UNIFIED AT WW ALONG WITH LINEAR CHAMP AS BALDOMIR BEAT JUDAH WHO HAD 3 OF THE 4 BELTS":!:

THATS A STUPID COMMENT..WOW..******* QUOTE OF THE WEEK X10...C'MON ARE YOU SERIOUS...atsch

 

Who decides that?

 

the Lineal champion is the only really recognized one. the rest are dubious.

 

age of the organization

.The Ring stopped giving belts to world champions in the 1990s, but began again in 2002.

One of Manny belts is one of those ,here we like you kind of belts.

he won that belt in 2003 after they stop for years giving them out and most of all the ring belts are vacant.

 

Beating the previous Ring champ or being ranked 1 or 2 and beating the other fighter ranked 1 or 2 is a by far greater acheivement than winning a ABC belt.

What would be a greater acheivement for instance;

Pacquiao beating Berto for his belt
or
Pacquiao beating Mayweather for the vacant Ring title?

 

the featherweight thing is a little nit picky.....

i mean its not his fault the other fighter didnt pay the fees but i guess technicaly your right.

 

But for "official" reasons he never won it though

 

who gives a ****


past 130 it's been dodgey at best

130 and before, good stuff

 

this is true, officialy, i wonder when inducted in the HOF will this be corrected or just be something that a boxing follower should know.

 

This content is protected