Props to Pac for taking the more dangerous fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slyk, Mar 22, 2012.


  1. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    I just have to address this.

    PACQUIAO WANTED TO FIGHT A COTTO REMATCH FIRST!!!

    Now that I got that **** out of the way moron, how the **** are you gonna say this is a low risk/high-reward fight for Floyd?? :patsch

    If Floyd doesn't look sensational against Cotto and dominates, he will be criticized in comparison to Pacquiao for the rest of what is left of his career. (Biased because Manny just lost to a man whom Floyd shut out, but that's besides the point.)

    This is not even a fight Floyd wanted, so just off of that FACT (not opinion), this is literally the best of a bad situation.

    He HAD to fight someone on May 5th, and Cotto was the most legitimate candidate that was available.

    Floyd has everything to lose in this situation lady-boy.
     
  2. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    I don't contradict myself, so what is your point?

    I said this fight will not be fan friendly because Bradley can and will box Pacquaio from the outside, but I'm not sure he can do enough to win the fight.
     
  3. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    cotto is far tougher than bradley.
     
  4. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    I don't know who's tougher than who, but this is the first time in a long time where I wasn't disapointed with the choice of opponent.
     
  5. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    You *******s can try to blow up Bradley. They **** don't Dlh with real boxing fans. Pacquiao is going to brutalize Bradley. Floyd is going to stop Cotto late.

    Both are inferior fighters to Pacquiao and Floyd. Just stop. ****ing troll Pigpuga and the ****ing troll Lanceuptheass just talk **** about Floyd because they can. Two ****ing trolls defending Pacquiao/dissing Floyd, and looking like assholes everyday to us posters.
     
  6. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    :lol::lol::rofl:rofl ouch.

    TKO6 :yep
     
  7. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::rofl:rofl:rofl

    Owned
     
  8. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007

    pac would beat both anyway so a cotto-pac fight is not as interesting as pac-bradley.
     
  9. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Give it up people.

    They are both OK fights.
    Not stellar, but good enough as a keep-active fight.

    Cotto is not gonna do **** to FMJ.
    Not to downplay Cotto or anything, FMJ is just a class above Cotto.

    Bradley is either gonna run from or hedbutt Pac as soon as Pac lands a 1-2.
    Sure he can box Pac, but as soon as Pac lands, and HE WILL, it's gonna be Mosley all over again.

    I have no problem people saying Bradley has some chance against Pac, but people claiming Cotto has a good chance against FMJ is something else.
    It's FMJ. You seem to forget how good he is against the likes of Cotto.
     
  10. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    No brah, that was a TKO 4 Via 2 piece combo:lol:
     
  11. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Pac rematching Cotto is stupid.
    That doesn't need any explanation.
    I can't believe Arum even allowed that as an option.

    FMJ fighting Cotto, is OK.
    It's not the best out there, but it's definitely cashable and would look good on his resume.
    It's just that nobody else out there is on the skill level of FMJ, so pretty much everybody else (except Pac perhaps) will definitely be a cakewalk for FMJ.
    At least that's what we would expect of him, making this a high risk for FMJ.
    But as far as skills are concerned, I see no problems calling this a low risk fight for Floyd.

    It's Floyd. How can people suddenly forget how good he is?
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    you might have forgot that pacquiao wanted floyd first but we all knew that floyd priced himself out. :deal

    did i say cotto is a low-risk? i said medium risk but high reward figth for floyd. you have trouble reading. cotto might be a high-risk but cotto has seen much mileage already and was stopped by margarito and pacquiao too recenlty. cotto is still good but not the cotto of 2 and 3 years ago.

    so this fight is not what floyd wanted? so which fight did floyd want? don't say pac cause he seriously outpriced himself out of the fight and said that he would not be forced unto a fight with him because of some health issues.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    it's cringeworthy in the way you are trying to big up ortiz name just because floyd has stopped him via suckerpunch. you admitted that ortiz is a mental midget and just because he dropped a shaky-chinned berto at WW catchweight, you seemed to think he would drop even pacquiao? not even mosley who is a much bigger puncher than ortiz can drop pac and you are guaranteeing it? do you have a crystal ball *****?
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007


    as usual, *****s patting another *****'s back. how predictable.
     
  15. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected