Its not a selection its a mandatory he has to fight bradley. Bradley is better than Malignaggi, Urango, Ancient Castillo and Lazcano anyway
I agree that he is better than Lazcarno and maybe Castillo but he had name value and he was coming off a good win in Herman N????o. I think Urango and Malignaggi are more dangerous than Bradley.
You could argue either way over Lazcano, which is a tune up fight, but not the others. Witter would definatly not be such short odds of 10/1 on to beat any of the others. What does Ricky Hatton have to do with how poor Whitters opponent Bradley is anyway, he didnt pick him.
Even witter himself has stated that he has moved on from Ricky Hatton... "It comes and goes, talk of me fighting Ricky, but I have other things to take care of. "He's not that important now and there are other avenues for me. "Torres and Kotelnik are both very hard fights and ones I want to try and unify the titles. :deal
and what do you say concerning Witter repeatedly saying he will fight Hatton for nothing? Having originally said do it in a winner take all. do you really think he's bluffing? face it mate, all of your and Hatton's lame excuses have been blown out the water.