Pudzianowski vs. Thompson declared No Contest

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by JayF, Nov 28, 2011.


  1. JayF

    JayF Active Member Full Member

    594
    0
    Oct 8, 2010
    The controversial decision has been overturned:

    http://www.yourmma.tv/news/details....on-mariusz-pudzianowski-ksw-17-no-contest.htm

    Was a really bad decision. Seems like KSW are trying to save face on this one.
     
  2. PivotPunch

    PivotPunch Guest

    I agree it should have been a draw (or a win for Thompson), I´m happy to see that KSW is trying to save their face they´re doing the right thing
     
  3. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,043
    Oct 13, 2010
    it wasnt a "bad decision" it was a fix

    just like pacquiao marquez

    both sports are rife with corruption
     
  4. Black2023

    Black2023 Guest

    Im guessing Pudz is finding it hard to make it in MMA
     
  5. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    They needed another round between the two to determine a winner for certain. However it is worth noting that Pudz could probably fight Thompson once a month in Poland if he so chose. People would pay to see it and Thompson would get paid to fight. It's a win win situation for everyone.
     
  6. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    I havent seen the fight, is there any grounds for Pudz winning, how did it go down ect?
     
  7. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    Thompson seemed to win the first, Pudz the second. It was just a lot of sloppy grappling over a prolonged ugly fight. A draw seemed most likely - with a third round to determine the winner as per the rules. However Pudz got the nod.

    They should add Tank Abbott vs Scott Ferazo to the undercard each month.
     
  8. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    Cheers fella, think I'll give this one a miss if that's that case
     
  9. James23

    James23 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,400
    0
    Jun 25, 2009
    Yes, a **** poor decision in a rinky-dink organization that has no real relevance in the world of MMA is indicative of corruption throughout and is on a par with the questionable judging in a World Championship Boxing match between two of the biggest names in the sport on the biggest stage.

    Makes perfect sense?
     
  10. Matt Ldn

    Matt Ldn Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,873
    0
    Dec 14, 2010
    This could be possibly one of MMAs greatest trilogys
     
  11. greathamza

    greathamza Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,652
    1
    Feb 14, 2011
    This could top Rampage/Wanderlei and Edgar/Maynard together
     
  12. Ai-edy2007

    Ai-edy2007 STOCKTON 209 MOTHER****ER Full Member

    7,542
    0
    Apr 9, 2011
  13. JayF

    JayF Active Member Full Member

    594
    0
    Oct 8, 2010
    I know that you're trying to make a point, but just to let you know that KSW isn't 'rinky dink' - about 17,000 in the arena and millions watching on TV.
     
  14. James23

    James23 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,400
    0
    Jun 25, 2009
    Yeah, it's rinky-dink. Pull Pudzianowski off that card and see if 17,000 people still show up. Doubt you'll even get 5,000 and most people wouldn't give enough of a **** about it to tune in on T.V.

    Put Brock Lesnar on some truly shitty organization and you're going to sell out the venue and if it's broadcast, people will tune in. The organization will still be shitty.