Pulev vs Spinks

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by uncletermite, Sep 6, 2015.


Page 2 of 4
  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    LOL
    but if Spinks has a chocfest and gains a massive 50lb belly, Spinks beats pulev!!

    ridiculous whoever had the biggest belly wins rubbish idiots
     
    HerolGee, Sep 7, 2015
    HerolGee, Sep 7, 2015
    #16
  2. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    Pulev is a cautious fighter who dictates to his opponents footwork,he has the size advantage and is much better defensively than ****ey.holmes rocked him several times in two fights with the jab alone because he was cautious and picked his shots,Spinks is also not an aggressive fighter and speed is not a real factor here because pulev is a very fast counter puncher himself,letting the much bigger guy dictate pace wont go so good for him,,,see these are real life breakdowns of each fighter you are unable to do so because you lack any real merit ,just the casual,well spinks will win because Pulev never beat anyone nonsense.:roll:
     
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    #17
  3. rex11y

    rex11y Active Member Full Member

    558
    12
    Oct 17, 2007
    Stop bigging Pulev up Termite. If he was such a great counter puncher then why was he pole axed so easily by Klitschko. Also speed is always one of the key factors in a fight, especially when allied with power. Witness Tyson's destruction of fighters such as Bruno and you will see what speed does to these bigger, lumbering fighters. Likewise Spinks used his speed and boxing ability against a far bigger fighter in ****ey.
    Mediocre is the only word that comes to mind when referring to Pulev and I sense an agenda on your part to make Klitschko's win seem more significant that it actually was.
     
    rex11y, Sep 7, 2015
    rex11y, Sep 7, 2015
    #18
  4. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Pulev is ****ing garbage.
     
    Azzer85, Sep 7, 2015
    Azzer85, Sep 7, 2015
    #19
  5. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015


    You do realize Spinks is not klitchko right?again another pointless remark on your part the old 'well let me throw Klitchko in here" even though a 6'6 giant has nothing to do with a spinks in anything.:nut

    you even used arguably the best fighter ever in Tyson and think even in 1990 that,that somehow merits speed in comparing this match up ,which again is "SPINKS" not "TYSON"!:nut
     
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    #20
  6. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Kovalev, Moorer and Spinks would all beat Poolev
     
    Azzer85, Sep 7, 2015
    Azzer85, Sep 7, 2015
    #21
  7. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    Moorer maybe?The others most likely not.You being a big Tyson fan,what exactly makes Pulev garbage,you're the same guy proclaiming Tyson beat world beaters...news flash...pulev would most likely be Tysons toughest opponent he fought in the 80's,not just because of skill but indeed a 6'4 250 pounder with good overall skills is something Tyson had not faced in that era.


    this match up right here pits a a natural 190 pounder vs a 250 pound monster..do you really think Tyson goes thru pulev like he did spinks?:nono
     
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    #22
  8. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson would knock Poolev out of the ring.
     
    Azzer85, Sep 7, 2015
    Azzer85, Sep 7, 2015
    #23
  9. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    Yet makes it out of round one.
     
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    #24
  10. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,048
    Oct 25, 2006
    250 pound monster?? Keep spinning man...and Spinks would have had to cut an arm off to weigh 190 pounds again.
    You are the most intellectually dishonest poster in the history of this board.
    Thank heavens nobody takes you seriously.
     
    fists of fury, Sep 7, 2015
    fists of fury, Sep 7, 2015
    #25
  11. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    Spinks was not a natural HW,this wouldn't really matter except for the fact he wasnnt a power puncher either....FACTS!:hi:
     
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    uncletermite, Sep 7, 2015
    #26
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,400
    25,844
    Jan 3, 2007
    Pulev sucks. I'd pick Michael ( and Leon ) to beat him
     
    mr. magoo, Sep 7, 2015
    mr. magoo, Sep 7, 2015
    #27
  13. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,260
    17,983
    Apr 26, 2006
    You,re sure about Leon? Michael would beat him for sure:bbb
     
    heerko koois, Sep 7, 2015
    heerko koois, Sep 7, 2015
    #28
  14. rex11y

    rex11y Active Member Full Member

    558
    12
    Oct 17, 2007
    Yup Pulev sucks big Termite b.alls! Or is it that Turdmite sucks big Pulev b.alls! Someone is sucking that's for sure.:lol:
     
    rex11y, Sep 7, 2015
    rex11y, Sep 7, 2015
    #29
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,400
    25,844
    Jan 3, 2007
    Okay Leon might be a stretch. But also not out of the question if in the rare instance he showed up in good form. Beating a shot Muhammad Ali and Bernardo Mercado was certainly comparable to beating a man of Pulev's caliber. Not something I'd bet on but you get my point that I don't think much of Pulev.
     
    mr. magoo, Sep 8, 2015
    mr. magoo, Sep 8, 2015
    #30
Page 2 of 4