Put a prime Sonny Liston in the 70s...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Jun 23, 2010.


  1. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    What would be a better post :huh:huh
    Yeah... Suzie is just biased. Hes a good poster but he's biased as hell. Yeah Foreman was slow but he was never fast to begin with.
     
  2. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    Responding about how he was shot. Anyway, why are you responding to my response if you don't know why I made that response in the first place?
     
  3. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    **** I'm confused now....
    I was responding to your response about Martin knocking out Liston. Saying that it's unfair to use that against him.
    And you were comparing that to Suzie saying that mid 40s Foreman is slow? Are we on the same page now? lol
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    1990s Foreman was old, fat, and slow. This is not being biased. This is being realistic.
     
  5. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
    I think the Foreman of the 90's was slow and too heavy, but not old.
     
  6. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
    To make that clear, Foreman wasn't damaged like many boxers become at his age.
    Age didn't bother George. I do think he was too heavy. If he could of got used to
    maybe fighting around 240, it would would of helped him.