1. If not - Olympic's testing should be implemented 2. If yes - there's no need for it 3. Or maybe it's more sophisticated :think
I would rather read the answer from someone who has read more than ANYTHING about this and could share with his knowledge in 2 or 3 sentences.
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/boxing/post/_/id/1423/peterson-khan-ii-off-victor-conte-told-us-so Summary: Neither USADA nor NSAC would have caught Peterson
Good article. It seems VADA has better guidelines than USADA/WADA. Check out the article below. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7516484.stm "Danish researchers recently set out to test how well the labs can detect EPO by medicating eight student volunteers with the drug over a period of weeks. The athletic performance of these students improved in some cases by 50%. But when over 100 urine samples from the students were sent anonymously to two WADA-approved laboratories, they produced very different results. One of the labs declared none of the samples positive."
Did the DC boxing commish protect Peterson? Peterson's referee, judges and his mystery man who was talking to those judges? It appears so. Read that Khan's titles that Peterson stole will be stripped from Peterson and Khan will fight another opponent for them..............
I think it has already been established that the answer is no. From my understanding, even USADA testing "may" not have included the test that caught this.