Qawi/Braxton - ATG?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JohnThomas1, May 10, 2008.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,355
    45,544
    Apr 27, 2005
    Do we consider it so for Dwight?
     
  2. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    The night he beat Eddie Davis he was great but never showed the same promise again.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,355
    45,544
    Apr 27, 2005
    You don't consider his fights vs Saad great efforts? I do know it's possible the wars had finally caught Saad of course, as well as him being stylistically perfect for a guy that kept going like Braxton.
     
  4. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    349
    Jul 13, 2007
    I've always really liked Qawi...one of my favorites back in the day. He always came to fight. I'm not sure too many would agree with me on here, but Qawi would match up tough with anyone at 175. As time passes I think he'll be appreciated more...Great fighter? Hell yeah! Tough as nails.
     
  5. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Falls under the Great category, just short of the All Time Greats.
     
  6. abraq

    abraq Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    19
    Sep 17, 2007
    In the LHWs, I would say that he would be borderline top 10 ATG.

    At Cruiserweight (the official ones only), I place him at number 2 - behind Holyfield.
     
  7. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Great pressure fighter. I was very suprised that he did not pressure Spinks more & allowed Spinks to freely move around the ring a pile up the points. A victory over Spinks that night would have cemented it for him. Didn't Braxton also fight James Scott?
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    I consider him a very good fighter, top 20 lightheavyweight of all time.
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I think the man is a borderline ATG at 175, we all do this kind of thing differently, but the very greatest fighters (in a weight classes history) are what i refer to as the 'elite', then come the ATGs, and Qawi was one of the premier fighters in his era, probably cuts it as an ATG for me in that light
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,355
    45,544
    Apr 27, 2005
    Going via the poll it seems "borderline" would be fitting.
     
  11. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    I think he makes it and would have ben a dominant champ if he hadn't have run into Spinks.
     
  12. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Its a kop out vote I know but I went for "borderline", great fighter who would have achieved more but for Mike Spinks being around, but the bottom line is that Mike Spinks WAS around.
     
  13. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,355
    45,544
    Apr 27, 2005
    Do you consider Dejesus an ATG?
     
  14. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Again a great fighter but not an ATG. I guess its where you put the bar and how the boxer had fared with rivals around at that time. I'd say DeJesus was an all time top 20-25 lightweight, if thats an ATG then so be it, I'd have no real arguement. Same with Qawi, not an ATG in my book but pretty close, hence my vote..;)
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,355
    45,544
    Apr 27, 2005
    Fair answer Gaz. Now from my understanding a fighter you consider great isn't an ATG unless he has the resume. So whilst you "might" consider Qawi just as good a fighter as some greats you think are ATG you base their status on superior resume right? Seems like a reasonable criteria.