Quarry vs. Haye.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Joe E, Jul 2, 2011.


  1. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    He definitely isn't faster or a bigger puncher. Like I've said multiple times in this thread, who did he really prove it against? I've seen plenty of Haye's fights actually. You should watch Quarry's fights against Frazier I, patterson, Ali I, Lyle, Shavers, those fights.

    nope. my logic is Quarry had more heart and fought better guys then Haye will ever fight. even if he didn't win. he has greater credentials.

    Foster was a good puncher. Period. Lyle was a good slugger with boxing ability. Shavers was a way better puncher then Haye and would have KO'D haye. Against the best, who were better then the best that Haye fought, he fought well even if he didn't win. anyways this is coming from you who said Haye fought well against Wlad.

    well you seem to like to bring up Quarry's losses which don't really have to do with this fight at all. Quarry would push Haye like Thompson did and stop him late. Patterson and Ellis still had greater credentials then Haye at heavyweight so for blown up middleweights they seemed to turn out well didn't they :tong