Quarry - Would it be wrong to think...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Aug 25, 2007.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,046
    Apr 1, 2007
    He could of beaten Norton if he was in his prime, looking at how he gave Ken hell late in his career?

    Hmm?
     
  2. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    IMO,....Quarry would have to knock Norton out to win. I don't think he could of outpointed him. Norton was taller, and with a longer reach.

    The young Quarry of the 1967-68 era when he did box, might have had a chance to outbox Ken. But then Quarry became a slugger with his Frazier and similar fights.

    The most confident Quarry I saw was the one that did not fear Earnie Shavers and just bored in and stopped him in one round.

    Put Kenny on his back foot, against the ropes, and Quarry lands his hook big and early, is the only way I think Jerry can knock Norton out to win.
     
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,190
    15,197
    Jun 9, 2007
    I dont see any reason why a prime Quarry couldnt take Kenny.
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,550
    Jul 28, 2004
    How seldom do I read about the difference between the Quarry of '67-'69 and the version afterwards when he filled out, matured and became more of a slugger. That earlier version was something special, reference the Thad Spencer bout the 1 punch ko's of Scrapiron Johnson and Brian London, etc., he was a cruel, vindictive counter puncher and would mix in some effective boxing and moving. He could almost effortlessly deck or put a guy away with a counter right or left and seemed to like luring a guy into a corner where he would fire those counterpunches so well. He seemed bigger and thicker in physique and this emphasized his short arms. He returned to good boxing for Ron Lyle, but was more tempermentally inclined for slugging than he was earlier in his career. The early Quarry would have a real chance of catching Norton off the ropes with a big shot or two, and you know that Norton didnt handle power too well. The big difference was that the younger. 1967-68 version of Jerry Quarry was much quicker and that ko of Spencer was so impressive. He had it all in that fight, fast hands, power, and that effective counter punching style.
     
  5. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,666
    2,146
    Aug 26, 2004

    I heard the same about the abuse,Jerry had a new young wife and he got into the party mode, he admitted himself the Norton fight he prostituted himself ( he was drinking and doing coke). The Quarry of the shavers,Lyle fight would have been too much for Ken but Ken would have made it harder than Shavers and Lyle because he had faster hands but as soon as Jerry backed him up, Norton would run into trouble, I like Quarry more than likely by a Ko
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,965
    24,940
    Jan 3, 2007
    I would certainly like to think that Quarry could take Norton in his prime, but I'm not sure if the styles would have made for it to be so. A 1973 Quarry would have definately been a tougher test for Ken than a 1975 version, but not enough to score a knockout or a decision. Quarry had the tendency to bleed in the later rounds of a fight, while Ken tended to give long term boxers trouble. I'd see Norton taking this one late.
     
  7. Hawkeye

    Hawkeye New Member Full Member

    20
    2
    Aug 25, 2007
    I have been watching some of Quarry's fights on You Tube. I liked him in 67 agaisnt Alex Miteff. I thought he looked quicker and better conditioned then than he looked later. The 67 version of Quarry might have beaten Norton.
     
  8. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,046
    Apr 1, 2007
    Miteff's the arrogant guy that was talking **** that Quarry iced in one, wasn't he? :lol:
     
  9. Hawkeye

    Hawkeye New Member Full Member

    20
    2
    Aug 25, 2007
    No, Miteff was Argentinian and had come out of retirement. Quarry got him in about 3 if I remember right. Miteff was probably well past his prime, but Quarry looked lean and quick in that fight.
     
  10. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    To be honest, I think Quarry could have beaten Ken Norton by slugging like he did in 1975 if only he had been in better shape.

    I've heard he took the fight late-notice, as a replacement for Oscar Bonavena.
    Quarry was out of shape, and past his best, the drink/drugs/partying thing didn't help.

    All credit to Norton though, he is extremely underrated IMO.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,710
    29,041
    Jun 2, 2006
    Good post ,the Quarry that beat Lyle would have a real shot at beating Norton ,imo ,when they actually met Quarry was washed up and flabby ,with nothing left but his big heart.
     
  12. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    18
    Jul 29, 2007
    quarrys punch, nortons chin........that could mean a quarry victory. i´d pick him to win in fact.
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,550
    Jul 28, 2004
    The Quarry that fought and destroyed Thad Spencer would have also destroyed Ken Norton. As has been already said, he was leaner and quicker then, and was still into that counterpunching strategy of coming off the ropes. Norton coulnt handle a quick, hard puncher like that, although I give him his props for being able to handle Ali like no one else. I also think the '67-'68 Quarry would have done much better against both Ali and Frazier.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,533
    27,143
    Feb 15, 2006
    If they both met in their respective primes I would bet on Quarry.
     
  15. bigjake

    bigjake Active Member Full Member

    1,385
    9
    Jul 19, 2004
    he also fought to a draw with miffet too also tony alongi and quarry drew