Question about history of boxing scoring

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by RealDeal, Sep 17, 2017.


  1. RealDeal

    RealDeal Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    1,689
    1,829
    May 2, 2009
    I have heard that in the old days (I'm talking late 19th century and early 20th century) you had to win by knockout or the fight was a draw. Is this correct? I've also heard of newspaper decisions...when did these come around and were they considered official? Also, were the newspaper decisions round-by-round scoring, or did they just pick an overall winner for the fight? When did they actually start round-by-round scoring by judges at ringside like they do today?
     
    MrPook likes this.
  2. RealDeal

    RealDeal Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    1,689
    1,829
    May 2, 2009
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Good questions.

    Different arrangements were made from fight to fight, I think.
    The draw thing was common but some fights were won/lost on official decision too.
    There were also "no decision" fights, which isn't even a draw. "newspaper decisions" were completely unofficial.

    I don't know the round-by-round thing. I wonder about that.
     
  4. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,433
    Feb 10, 2013
    How a newspaper scored depended entirely on the writer. There was no codified system in place in regards to scoring in most areas. Some reporters scored on a round by round basis, others scored the fight as aesthetic whole, meaning a guy could win 9 rounds but get his ass absolutely kicked in the 10th and be judged by a writer as the loser. Its not right or wrong its just a different way of scoring based on the era.
     
    Unforgiven and Mr.DagoWop like this.