Question about mandatories

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by acie2g, Aug 31, 2015.


  1. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    Right now the mandatory to Thurmans title is Andre Berto, would anyone be mad at Thurman choosing to face Brook or Bradley over Berto?
    And explain why or why not.:good
     
  2. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,105
    Sep 21, 2013
    Is this one of those cryptic "If it's good for everybody else, then why does Floyd get so much hate over it?" threads?

    Looks like one!
     
  3. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    Nothing to do with Mayweather at all I'm not big on the May-Berto fight. Just a question if Thurman turned down his mandatory to fight Brook or Bradley would you be mad.
     
  4. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,729
    6,133
    May 2, 2015
    Nope. This is another garbage anti-GGG thread.
     
  5. #1Rounder

    #1Rounder Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,581
    56
    Jul 22, 2008
    Where's the question about Mandatories???
     
  6. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    Would you be mad at a guy like Thurman facing Brook or Bradley over of his current mandatory Berto.
     
  7. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    People love mandatories when it fits their agenda and preferences. The moment it doesn't, they condemn them. Very few are consistent on mandatories. Me? I could care less. I judge the opponent based on their career and ability, not where a corrupt and non-respectable sanctioning body ranks them.