Question about Pressure Fighters & Classification

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vysotsky, Mar 6, 2011.


  1. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I'm curious in how you would classify pressure fighters who don't rely on volume, especially ones that rely heavily on counter punching.

    Adamek at CW had average output but was usually stalking forward offering pressure but would use more of a boxer/counter puncher approach to create offensive oppertunities.

    Lebedev is another guy who has a boxer/puncher approach, doesn't have a high volume output and relies heavily on his counter punching ability but mostly stalks forward pressuring his opponent.

    How would you classify the Adamek/Lebedev appraoch where you stalk forward pressuring your opponent but generally rely on counter punching to create most of your offense? Would you still classify them as pressure fighters or do you generally reserve that for guys who use volume and unbridled aggression like Calzaghe or Jirov?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,044
    48,171
    Mar 21, 2007
    Counter-pressure fighters. Juan Manuel Marquez is a fine example, and I bet this is the closest will get to classifying Bob Fitzsimmons in modern terms. I think of these fighters as pressuring space rather than the man.
     
  3. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Joe Louis falls into that category too. Tony Canzoneri too. Pressure-counterpunchers? :D

    I don“t think much of those classifications. They are very shallow anyway since every fighter has an individual style.
     
  4. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    :good JMM the last half decade or so is a great example.

    The other question i had but didn't ask is what about swarmers with high vs low output, Calzaghe vs Katsidis? Calzaghe is more of the rule, Katsidis more of the exception?

    P.S. what ever happened to that Fitz project you guys had going on in here. the last posts some of you were breaking down some of his techniques from a manual and haven't seen it again? that **** was interesting.
     
  5. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    A swarmer with lower output is a slugger. Volume defines swarming.
     
  6. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I think skill level involving their defensive ability plays a role. Dempsey didn't have an extraordinary output and he sure as hell isn't a slugger.

    This needs clarification.

    Calzaghe who overwhelmes you with volume and tends to get into mid-inside range with their volume vs someone like Dempsey or Katsidis who have a lower output and use defensive skill and elusive upper body movement to get mid range/inside and pick their shots more carefully. No way i'll classify Dempsey as a slugger as it has a connotation with a lack of skill.
     
  7. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    McGrain has it right.

    Dick Tiger is one such example, he would pressure his opponents, make them react and then counter with power punches. He rarely "swarmed" his opponents but rather walked them down. A swarmer obviously throws a volume of punches but a pressure fighter doesn't necessarily have to be a swarmer, nor a slugger (a term usually reserved for wild punchers).
     
  8. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Di tullio is correct in that the proper name for what I call these guys is usually just Boxer-puncher. Louis, Marquez, Canzoneri all fit well in this convenient slot here.

    At the heavyweight level it's hard to classify swarmers(and you'll see most HW swarmers are swarmer/slugger hybrids like Tyson, Marciano and Dempsey) due to overall less sophisticated movement and decreased volume. But the goal is the same-to weave or slip inside crash as many heavy blows to the head and body as you can. and so I call them that.
     
  9. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    Boxer-puncher is a fairly broad term. You could put a lot of different type of boxers in that category.
     
  10. di tullio

    di tullio Guest

    Clottey-Judah and Mayweather-Judah are pretty good examples of this, by the way. It's funny, you can throw a lot of punches and not necessarily be a pressure fighter (Pacquiao), and you can put on pressure and not throw a lot of punches (Mayweather).

    Yes, I'm Pacquiao-Mayweathering this thread.
     
  11. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I'd call the current Pacquiao a Boxer/Puncher/Swarmer. Definitely a pressure fighter.

    I would not include Floyd in what i was describing above.
     
  12. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    Sal Sanchez too. I think of fighters that do this as aggressive counter-punchers that utilize angles and like to stay in punching range so they can parry/slip/weave punches effectively then unload their arsenal after making their opponents miss. Fighters like these control distance and love to keep the distance close enough to their opponents so they don't have to lunge in order to counter. They also have high Ring IQs and use most of their punches effectively and generally are pretty accurate. Look at Sanchez' fights (esp with Lopez) for a better grasp of what I mean.
     
  13. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    He pressured Mosley despite not overwhelming him as did Wright(also when he fought Trinidad). Do they usually fight like this? Not really but they used lots of pressure despite not having high outputs.
     
  14. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Well, that's kind of the purpose of the term right? In the paper rock scissors game of swarmer beats boxer beats slugger, there needs to be a fourth category where hybrids of basically all these styles end up. There are tons of different kinds of boxer-puncher, but it works in relation to the other terms.