Question for big Froch fans: Who are the fighters Froch COULDN'T KO at 168/175?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Decebal, Oct 11, 2008.


Page 3 of 3
  1. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006


    your dam right. besides calzaghe taylor is my fight fighter between 160-175 and he will win a title at 168 IMO, i gave him the second pavlik fight anyway. But we wont get into that
     
    Benjiabc, Oct 11, 2008
    Benjiabc, Oct 11, 2008
    #31
  2. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :lol:

    Yeah, I'd love it if I lived down the road from a nice guy like Froch. I'm sure he wouldn't mind me popping round for a cup of sugar. :p

    My point is that we're setting this guy up for a big fall! One thing is for him to hype himself, trying to get his name out there, by talking certain top fighters/proven world class fighters down, but it's another for us, who are supposed to be better than your average cheerleading fan, to fall into the trap of assuming he's so much better than then already. If he makes it, well, it was expected, almost; if he falls just short, then what? We chop his balls of like it sometimes befalls the England football team, for example? :huh :-(
     
    Decebal, Oct 11, 2008
    Decebal, Oct 11, 2008
    #32
  3. nufc16

    nufc16 Active Member Full Member

    1,370
    0
    Dec 3, 2005
    i was just listing one name. ofc there are more.
     
    nufc16, Oct 11, 2008
    nufc16, Oct 11, 2008
    #33
  4. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :lol: :good

    ...and my point was that we're in danger of not giving Froch credit for a good win against Pascal, because we're so busy talking him up as if he's already clearly better than Pavlik, Taylor, etc. (proven top level world class fighters).
     
    Decebal, Oct 11, 2008
    Decebal, Oct 11, 2008
    #34
Page 3 of 3