Question for Billy Nelson...

Exactly mand, i still havent recieved my answer for who burns beats and who he is likely to fight. Broner has a better last 2 fights and isnt even a belt holder, says it all really when you compare De leon/Litzau being beaten by a 'contender' ans Evensen/Laryea being beaten by a 'champ'. Im just sitting here laughing to be honest, no ****er in the right mind can justify that

 

Thinking of it, I am still convinced frank pulled some strings to get the fight and thought '**** it' if he wins we are laughing, if he loses then back to the domestic scene. he sold a tonne of tickets and he was happy. Burns comes up trumps (fair play to him for doing so too!) and since proceeds to fight 3 gimme's in a row with now elite-level showdown on the horizon, what an absolute joke!

 

Exactly, to be honest mate I dont have anything against Burns or Billy. I wish them all the best I really do. Its just I hate bullshitters and hypocrites and unfortunately Billy is fitting that profile more and more as he criticises Lee McAlistairs choics of opponent and lines up body after body! Im not asking him to go on a Froch type line-up, im just asking for a genuine challenge. Heck even choose our very own domestic king-pins if need be cos they will give more of a fight and more deserving of a chance then Cook is.

Buckland would absolutely ****ing brutalise Cook, I honestly believe the ko would be as viscious as Ahmed v Sexton. Does he get a crack-----nope, Cook does instead! why, cos sniffing coke and being ko'd by a the guy Burns beat somehow qualifies you to becoming a viable challenger (WBO of course). Its fights like this anger me, I feel like Billy is kicking me in the bollocks and asking me how it feels when he defends this ****...

 

:good

Now you can see why i have got the opinion that Frank put Burns in as '**** it' fight where he cashed in the chips----but won!

Litzau beat Caballero who was p4p for christ sakes, Gamboa + Juanma didnt want a piece of him yet Litzau did and won, the Broner upsets the party and all this without a trinket at stake, just a wbc contention place of some sort. Burns is a champ, wbo but still s champ technically and yet his fights have been of alot lower class. Its crazy to think that he gets away with it time after time again :shock:

 

The old saying goes that when you either raise your voice or get personal with attacks then you obviously have lost the debate. For you to say I know nothing/very little about pro bozing shows your capacity! terrible attitude there billy!

Its a rant about being ****ing fair, fight someoen with a pulse that deserves to be there not a picked opponent. As for promoters, why dont you do what Khan did then and create Burns promotions and make a legacy fighting top-calibre opponents if Frank is so bad in that regard?

You and Burns are epitomising everything that is wrongf with boxing today, to many paper champs fighting cherries and not defending against prime opposition. I hope that you (a pillar of the scottish boxing community) can hodl your head high knowing you are dodging/ducking/weaving tough fights now that you have the wbo trinket.

So much for a rant that every single poster on the board bar no-mas/dunky agree, top work again billy :good I look forward to watching Burns in a one-sided fight yet again, enthralling as always:good

As always all the best (cos i at least have dignity)...