Question: If Pac VISCIOUSLY KO'd JMM in the 6th. Would There Be Demand For 5th fight?

:deal
I couldn't agree more.

 

Juan set pac up idiot!! Pac, was leading by 1 point on all cards, despite seeing through a bloody face!!

 

LOL.

Pacquiao was a whopping 1 POINT ahead going into the 6th.

Yeah, Marquez was certainly in danger of losing a decision. :roll:

 

Pacquiao's been launching himself trying to get off throwing his left with power for as long as I can remember.
There's nothing foolish about it considering that because his speed and quickness, he's gotten away with it until Marquez set up his training camp to catch Pacquiao coming in with full force power.

People have to be real, through the first 3 fights, Marquez' training camp was focused on the aspects of boxing the pants off of Pacquiao. Because the decisions were dishonest and thought of to be again in a 4th encounter, Marquez' focus for fight 4 was to land the right hand with power when Pacquiao launched himself foward to punch at him.

Marquez had landed that right hand many times in the previous 3 fights but the only difference in the 4th fight is that Marquez trained and focused himself to land that same right with better torque and power behind it.

In that 4th fight Marquez dropped Pacquiao with the right in the 3rd and hurt him several other times with that right hand throughout the fight.
If you call that luck, then you DKSAB!

 

jmm won 2, 3 and put his stamp on 4. get over it *******s. jmm is the superior fighter. life goes on.

 

We all know Marquez won at least 3 out of the 4 fights. I had him winning all 4

 

No, because Marquez would be 0- 3- 1 against Pacquiao.

 

arum made those rematches because there were clouds over each of the decisions. pac didn't secretly hire ariza. everyone knew. jmm hiring heredia had nothing to do with that ko. pac lunging in face forward as jmm timed his overhand right had everything to do with it.

 

*******s and their constant excuse making...

 

Ok, a guy who arguably won at least 2 of the 4, (He clearly beat Pacquiao in their 3rd fight) is pathetic for not taking a fifth fight after the greatest knockout this decade. :-(

 

Diva omitted the part were roidquez hired the #1 ped dealer.:rofl

 

Okay, probably over the head of the applicable demographic. My bad.

 

The majority don't believe marquez won 3/4 fights this board is just anti-PAC. Somehow people don't even mention the only reason the first fight was a draw was due to a judging error.

Pacquiao was fairly dominant in the 2 rounds leading up to the KO. That is why the KO was so shocking.

The fight was amazing. Pacquiao has the belt marquez wants. It is by far the biggest money fight out there for marquez. The circumstances of the fight (JMM comeback) suggest V should happen. PAC gave Marquez rematches. IDK any one of these suggest they should fight again.

If Pacquiao won he would have been 3 wins, 1 draw (due to judges error). Regardless of dissatisfaction over the scoring PAC would have struggled to sell another fight. Like all this stuff is pretty common sense people are just anti-PAC.

 

The real question is, why is 6 afraid of 7?

 

You will find more people that think Marquez won 3/4 or all 4 fights than you will thinking Pacquaio legit won the 2 decisions he got, your talking about a scoring error in a fight where you knock your opponent down 3 times in one rd none the less all you need is 4 rds total to win the fight the fact that it was a draw or in your opinion a 1 point win means Pac got dominated outside of the 1 rd.

People keep harping on these rematches it took him 5 years to give him the 1st rematch, and the only reason the 3rd fight happened was because the thought he was shot and could outdo Mayweather's performance. The 4th fight only happened because of the massive robbery that was fight 3. Marquez doesn't owe Pac anything they've already fought 4 times how many times do we need to see the same fight over and over again.