Question in regards to GGG-Canelo weight

He fought canelo and cotto at 54 which restarts the clock on mandos

 

that was pure bullshirt too. Floyd could even forgo fighting mando's wich was even worse.
forcing a catchweight in titlefights is wrong in many ways, but when it comes to forcing the mandatory challenger to cripple himself to get his rightful shot then boxing is really at an all time low.

 

Hey dummy in case you haven't noticed the WBC isn't enforcing the mando:deal and I told you fools for months that they wouldn't. I've been proven right so far while you're still wishing and waiting.:yep

 

If he’s retired then why is he still listed as the “Current Title Holder” of the WBA and WBC 154-lb titles?

 

I’m obsessed with boxing not having catchweights. Mayweather started a trend of catchweights that has been bad for boxing.

 

Beats me. He has officially announced his retirement. I don't know what else he can do.

 

Congratulations, you're right about this sport being ****. Pat yourself on the back.

 

Boxrec still has FMJ listed a the current title holder for both of those belts.

 

It was Pacquiao, then Mayweather did it and then finally Cotto/Canelo took it to a new level.

 

lol You tell em, Barcham.:good

 

golov****s are scared

canelo destroys golovkin at 155

similar to pac - de la hoya

 

All goes to prove belts often get in the way of great fights being made. And that's largely what there are intended to do in modern boxing. Who really cares about these multitude of belts we have today, anyway?

 

:good:yep