Question:Why some have Rocky overJack?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by burt bienstock, Jun 5, 2012.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,602
    27,273
    Feb 15, 2006
    Marciano might have the better resume, but there is still a big stylistic dynamic working against him here.
     
  2. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Thanks for the response, McGrain. I imagine Dempsey was in a difficult spot and don't honestly believe he had a fear of Harry (Wills, that is), compounded by the idea his style would've played favorably into Jack's hands. It is worth taking note he was in a position of power to push for it if he'd wanted, but I doubt legacy was much on his mind. Rarely is. It just gets a little depressing reading the same jargon about Rickard and race riots. :verysad
     
  3. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    HoI,it was not JARGON, it was facts, depressing though it might be...
    Tex Rickard was not allowed to stage this bout in New York by the Boxing Commission at that time. They allowed black and whites to fight for the title in the lower class weights, but not the heavyweights, during those days...It is the fear of a repurcussion of the race riots and deaths following the Johnson ko of Jeffries that led to NY State ban of mixed race heavyweight title bouts...Don't blame Dempsey for this terrible quagmire
    of events....Joe Louis my favorite HW, was the first heavyweight who
    was black who got a shot at the HW title in 1937 when he kod Jimmy Braddock. He proved to be a great fighter and deported himself as a
    great champion of all the people...So in conclusion Dempsey feared no man in the ring...He was a product of his times who had black co-workers he hired and befriended old sparring partners and opponents who were black.
    His legacy should not be besmirched bu unfair snipers living in a different times....Cheers.
     
  4. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011

    Well not just Dempsey.. he does the same about Greb. I like Burt, I just think he has goggles sometimes.

    As for the fight... People are acting like Dempsey had blinding speed the likes of Meldrick Taylor.. He didn't. Rockey was simply better in more areas and fought better opposition. It's really that simple. When you have somebody with more skills and advantages... PLUS... fought better people and did better against them... How on God's Green Earth can people still pick the other guy is beyond me. Rocky KO 5
     
  5. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Burt,

    Keeping your steadfast belief that it was race riots that prevented the fight and that it couldn't possibly of been fought elsewhere in mind and without placing the blame squarely on Dempsey's lap, it may be time to give that little, almost insignificant inch and admit that Dempsey wasn't particularly keen on going through with and fighting Wills. He wasn't interested in middleweight Greb or an all but shot Sam Langford. Dempsey won the title and saw fit to milk it for all it's worth like any good businessman would. He was neither the first nor last to do so. Consequently, not everyone can have their cake and eat it too and that led to a mediocre title reign and a diminished legacy, particularly with an inexplicable halt in activity level and deep freeze of the most prestigious championship in professional sports. It's just a bit bothersome for example, how gleefully you love to wax about Ray Robinson avoiding Charley Burley and Cocoa Kid - even throwing Archie Moore's name out there - when Robinson didn't have an fraction of the obligation to fight any of them that Dempsey did Harry Wills, his #1 contender for a number of years.
     
  6. Hammer Muldoon

    Hammer Muldoon Active Member Full Member

    1,252
    6
    Nov 27, 2010
    Sensational analysis :rofl
     
  7. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Thank you HoI for not placing the blame squarely on Dempsey's shoulders.
    Terrible events preceeded Dempsey/Wills non-fight, EVEN IF THEY SIGNED FOR A BOUT IN WHICH THEY DID...It was CANCELLED THROUGH NO FAULT OF DEMPSEY'S OR WILLS...So HoI whether you want to obliterate in your mind this fact, and distort history is not my problem...It is the the fans of today who get their pleasure kicking a fine gentleman Dempsey whose dead lo these many years and has no more witnesses alive to defend him...You now bring up a Sam Langford who was an old man 39-40 when Dempsey was champ and not a contender then at all. Why not bring up Peter Jackson, Jack Johnson, to bring in the mix ? The only VIABLE black heavyweight of that time was Harry Wills..Why bring up a great past 40 year old man to butress your dislike of Dempsey...You might not of read that when Dempsey and Wills SIGNED for there cancelled bout ,ols Sam Langford was asked " who do you think will win the bout between Dempsey and Harry wills "? Langford replied, " when they fight my money is on Jack cause he's thegreatest heavyweight I have ever seen ".Unquote ! But of course Langford and multitudes of boxing people of that time knew less than today's naysayers 85 years later...
    Was Dempsey keen to fight Harry Wills ? Whothe hell knows but he always claimed that Wills upstance would be to his liking...The vast majority of the boxing fraternity believed that and so do I ?
    One other thing ,there is no fighter i admire more than Harry Greb. NONE.
    But why would Dempsey take on a 160 pound MW ? If Jack won the public would say why the hell does he pick on a MW to fight ? That match would have been a no win situation for Dempsey...Imagine what the public reaction would have been if Joe Louis fought160 Tony Zale in the 1940s ?So HoI, you diminish the greatness of Jack Dempsey as a fighter, I on the other hand as a child spoke to old fighters and trainers who saw Dempsey fight, and raved about him, and I take their word seriously cause they were THERE !!! Good day...
     
  8. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    I favor Marciano slightly because I think he had some advantage in stamina (though not a great advantage), and hit a bit harder, and I think he took punches a tad better -- thought hose last two points could be debated.

    Also, the many times Dempsey took hard rights early in fights -- GunBoat Smith I, Brennan, Carpentier, Firpo, Tunney. Against that, Jack was gritty, and could generally contrive to atleast get his chin-proper out of the way; on the other hand, such a tendency against a right like Marciano's is tempting the fates.

    All this being said, if the two could be brought together, it might all come down to who has the better inside game, and it's possible that this would be Dempsey.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,825
    46,545
    Feb 11, 2005
    In addition my previous analysis, I feel that Marciano is more focused than Dempsey. Jack could get frustrated and get reckless and desperate. Marciano was much more cold-blooded and calculated in his approach. And when the end was in sight, Marciano was just as vicious.
     
  10. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Well Dempsey could be patient and methodically break a guy down. Watch what we have of the Brennan fight.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,046
    48,173
    Mar 21, 2007
    Greb was a MW was he? Was he a MW when he weighed in at 173lbs, 2lbs less than Carpantier's highest weight? The size differene between him and Greb was tiny but Demspey saw fit to fight him. Well i'd say Greb proved himself a better HW, in fact he did better against a lot of Dempsey's opponents than Dempsey did.

    Sorry Burt, it doesn't wash.
     
  12. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    A very long diatribe on perhaps the most tongue-in-cheek brief portion of the post. Of course, he wasn't going to fight Langford. I just find the whole bit of half-blind, deteriorated Langford coming for what would've been a great favor being told they wanted someone a little easier humorous. Wills certainly wouldn't fall in that description at that point ? Greb would've been a plenty viable contender and it's evident from the reports of their sparring and was even discussed at different times. There isn't anybody of that era with the steam to "pick on Greb". He damn well could've lifted the title off Dempsey.

    I'm not out to diminish Dempsey, I just don't think much of his opposition, title reign, freeze out of the title and lackluster effort to fight his #1 challenger in comparison to not only Marciano but other great Heavyweights in general.
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,187
    25,465
    Jan 3, 2007
    No way does Marciano beat Fireman Jim Flynn and if Firpo knocked him out of the ring, he might well stay there. A 37 year old, inactive Jess Willard was leagues better than Joe Walcott at that age, and would have left Marciano on ***** street. Of course Dempsey was fast. Who else could have bested the lightening reflex's of Sugar Jess Willard?
     
  14. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    SNV, obviously.
     
  15. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Sorry Mc, it doesn't wash. Harry Greb's true fighting weight was under 160 pounds which he weighed for Mickey Walker and Tiger Flowers twice, shortly before he retired...If he weighed more for a bout, why deprive yourself what you want to eat or drink.? But almost til he died Greb was a true MW which enhanced his greatest asset. SPEED...Every fighter walks around at much heavier weights then their championship weight...