Quick question about Ali-Frazier fights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by withoutwire, Feb 20, 2011.


  1. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    1972,,,,,,

    Led Zeppelin,,,,,$240,000 Gross per Concert
    After expenses, each member was paid $25,000 per concert performance.

    A 3-night performance,,,,,,,,,$75,000 per band member, take home.
     
  2. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    YES,,

    Arthur Mercante could have stopped the Frazier vs. Ali I fight in the 15th Round.

    After the knockdown, Joe landed a couple of bomb lefts and one right, and then
    at the 1:30 mark, he landed a monster left with Ali up against the ropes, and
    Muhammad was hurt bad.
    Nobody would have complained.
     
  3. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,677
    2,555
    Oct 18, 2004
    Foreman admitted in a KO interview that he was glad Joe stared him in the face, because his knees were shaking.
     
  4. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    1971 Sparring Partners;

    Ken Norton
    Jim Lee Elder
    Rufus Brassell
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Wow so it have everything to do with Frazier falling off and nothing to do with the different tactics Ali emplyed? PP disagrees!!!!! Ali went all out early in FOTC and overally engaged, he fought more tactically in the rematch/rubber and earned his wins
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,993
    12,859
    Jan 4, 2008
    That's nothing. Il Duce thinks Frazier was further from his prime than Ali in FOTC for god's sake.:lol::lol::lol:

    Yeah. But it's not good manners to acknowledge this. The Frazier that dropped Quarry with a bodyshot and could have killed Bugner wasn't fit to be outside a hospital, don't you know. Little known fact is that he had to use an seeing-eye dog as early as 1973 to get around.:D
     
  7. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    Bok a Chu.......

    Wrong, I never sad Frazier was further from his prime than Ali..

    'Smokin Joe' was quicker, better defensively and punched faster in 1968 thru 1970.
    Joe was great in March 1971,,,,,,,,,,but he was even better, earlier in his career.

    Just ask sparring partner Rufus Brassell,,,,,I think he would know better than you and me.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,993
    12,859
    Jan 4, 2008
    You said that Joe would have stopped Ali if he never been exiled and they'd met in 69. In other words you believe that what you consider a prime Frazier would have done better against a prime Ali than he did in FOTC. Ergo: Frazier must have been further from his prime in that fight, according to you.

    And I can't for the world of me see how Frazier ever was faster than against Ellis, Foster and in FOTC. For me, he's noticeable sharper against Ellis than against Mathis, for example.
     
  9. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    In my opinion,,,,,,,,1969 Joe Frazier stops 1969 Muhammad Ali.

    The 69' Joe was 'the man', no way would Ali be able to keep him off with
    those 'slappy' punches.

    For sure, Ali isn't wearing him down. And, the better defensive Joe gets hit with
    less punches.
     
  10. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,231
    2,416
    Mar 26, 2005
    Frazier gave EVERYTHING he had in the FOTC with Ali on March 8,1971...you would have had to kill Joe that night..he was not to be denied....but he was never the same fighter after that night...
     
  11. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010

    Rocky J,,,,,Correct,,,,,,,,,that was Joe's 'pinnacle'

    Much like Jack Nicklaus winning the Master's at an older age.
    He greatest triumph, but not his 'prime time'.

    Same with Joe,, he did win his greatest victory, a notch below his
    prime. His timed hand speed in 1969, was faster than in 1971.

    Same too, when he ran the 100-yard dash, and the 440-yard sprint.

    If the 11th round of the FOTC happened in 1969, it would have been stopped.
     
  12. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    Was Joe Frazier 100% or capable of being 100% in March 1971.

    He was not the same after April 1970. He broke his ankle in Las Vegas, and
    was out of training for several months.

    Rufus Brassell, did say in an Ebony interview, that Joe had lost his lateral movement
    after that injury. And it limited his torque when throwing the super hard shots.

    Before that injury, he did move side-to-side much better, and was a harder target to hit.
    While helping Smokin Joe train for Jimmy Ellis in February 1970, Brassell pointed out
    that Joe stayed low, and was cat-quick in moving from side-to-side.
    The angles made Joe impossible to hit square, and when you tried to hit him, you
    could easily leave yourself open, as he would shift to one side or the other.
    You would either eat a left hook to the jaw, or a right hand to the body.
     
  13. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    55
    Dec 26, 2009
    Interesting.
     
  14. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    38
    Jul 6, 2005
    I thought Frazier deserved the second fight. Ali held far to much. There are over 140 extended clinches initiated by Ali in that fight. I think that qualifies as excessive. Its the worst bout of the the three. I thought the third fight was a lot more clear for Ali than most people. The rounds that Frazier won he did so very convincingly but in my opinion these were few and far between.
     
  15. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    82
    May 30, 2009
    Thank you. Bojak covered this pretty much too though.

    People who simply say Frazier declined aren't being completely objective.