Quigg vs Agbeko - Nov 22th

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Txomo, Oct 2, 2014.


  1. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,592
    Apr 13, 2014
    Yes but Kiko is/was a beatable champion, that's why McGuigan went that route. Your talking like Frampton has cleaned out the Super bantams when infact he has only faced 3 world level opponents himself.

    Cazares was a blown up flyweight
    Molitor was shot
    Kiko whilst a good fighter was a weak champion.

    I'm a fan of both Quigg and Frampton you do know that you can be don't you. This isn't sega vs Nintendo back in primary school.
     
  2. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,264
    18,356
    Feb 4, 2012
    I'd say Frampton's Nintendo in this one.
     
  3. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,592
    Apr 13, 2014
    I was always a Nintendo boy myself.

    As paying British boxing fans we need to see it. As a Lancashire lad I would like to see Quigg win on a county/nationalistic level, but as a fight fan the sky is the limit for the victor.

    Both McGuigan and Hearn need to reign their egos in and sort it out.
     
  4. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Frampton fans live in a dream world. Talk about how poor Quigg's opponents are, yet forget that Quigg beat the man who crushed Kiko TWICE.

    Then again, most Frampton fans are Irish so you can understand why they are so unbelievably thick.
     
  5. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,110
    Sep 21, 2013
    The old triangle theory... Utter nonsense.
     
  6. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,264
    18,356
    Feb 4, 2012
    Did he "crush" Kiko? I wouldn't describe it thus. Now Bernard Dunne's losses. Those were crushing.
     
  7. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,264
    18,356
    Feb 4, 2012
    Agreed. In all honesty I don't care who wins. I just think it'd be Frampton. Although I've been wrong before.
     
  8. Bent-nose

    Bent-nose Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,251
    394
    Feb 19, 2012
    If Quigg and Gallagher thought Galahad wasn't ready they would have took the fight, rather than taking a smaller purse for fighting another bantamweight.
     
  9. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,376
    11,881
    Apr 19, 2010
    hoping mr hyde forces the issue
     
  10. Bent-nose

    Bent-nose Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,251
    394
    Feb 19, 2012
  11. Bent-nose

    Bent-nose Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,251
    394
    Feb 19, 2012
    It won't do the link but Terry Dooley is the Manchester-based journalist.
     
  12. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Because he has actually faught some fighters that are in the same division as him rather than a weight or two below!!!
     
  13. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    If its good enough for the best in the division then why cant Quigg fight him? sick of listening to people slag Quigg off, yes his opponents aren't always the best but he's fighting someone that the very best fought so why aren't you criticising Rigo?
     
  14. Jim Bowen

    Jim Bowen MARVELOUS Full Member

    5,162
    0
    Aug 5, 2011

    Let's rephrase that. Hearn has Sky, without Hearn and Sky the fight makes significantly less, how much less do you reckon this fight would make should it be on Framptons now favoured Boxnation? That's the thing with this, McGuigan and Frampton can't put together a Quigg-Frampton event, who would they have on the undercard for a start? The share is 50/50 because Quigg's representatives put in all the leg work, all Frampton and McGuigan need to do is turn up on the night, how does that deserve more than 50%?