Quincy Taylor rated No.1 by the ring magazine in a list of top 10 middleweights on March 1996

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Oct 20, 2018.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Roy Jones was rated No.1 at super middle at this time, do you think if Taylor moved up at this time he could have teste Roy better than the challengers that fought Roy at super middle after the Toney fight? Do you think any Top 10 middles around that time could have been Top 10 super middles had they of moved up?
     
  2. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    You seem to base yr entire boxing knowledge off this 1 month magazine from 96. Go on ebay and buy one from 82.
     
    robert ungurean and BlackCloud like this.
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    lol! It`s the only mag I kept, I stopped reading the ring magazine in the 90`s, I kept this one because it had a list of the best fighters in the last 50 years before `96 and I prefered boxing back then, not in terms of quality, but excitement and personality.
     
  4. Bronze Tiger

    Bronze Tiger Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,329
    5,251
    Jun 23, 2018
    I used to read KO Magazine. They used to have a cool poster of different boxer every month
     
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Yes, I used to stick each poster on my bedroom wall when I was 15.
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  6. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    I had posters of Heather Thomas, but to each his own.
     
    PhillyPhan69 and Bronze Tiger like this.
  7. Bronze Tiger

    Bronze Tiger Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,329
    5,251
    Jun 23, 2018
    But to answer your
    I just googled Heather Thomas...niiiiice
     
  8. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    You must be young!

    Or, I'm just old.
     
  9. Bronze Tiger

    Bronze Tiger Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,329
    5,251
    Jun 23, 2018
    But to answer your question...no Quincy Taylor would not have been a test for Roy
     
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Brilliant! My mum didn`t like the pic of Daniel Zaragoza pinned on my wall during his profile month!;)
     
  11. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    :duh
     
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Jorge Castro was rated fourth by the ring in that month `96, I saw him get dominated by Jones, where does anyone think Castro and Taylor would rank in today`s Top 10 middle list?
     
  13. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,359
    26,576
    Jun 26, 2009
    Those were the bomb. Can’t get that in the internet/cell phone age.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  14. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,359
    26,576
    Jun 26, 2009
    Magazine dates are a couple of months ahead of date they are printed (a March 1996 would be probably published in January).

    His most recent win at time of publication was over Julian Jackson, which explains his ranking.

    Just so happens that in March of 1996 he got stopped by Keith Holmes.

    So, no, he wouldn’t have been any kind of threat to RJJ.
     
  15. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,571
    Nov 27, 2010
    The middleweight division was in a state of flux at the time, with no-one standing out from the pack. Hopkins obviously changed that towards the end of the decade, and stamped his authority over the division by winning the unification tournament against Trinidad.

    Taylor was on a nice run at the time, but rather like Frankie Randall in that era he seemed to get it altogether too late in his career (he was not as good as Randall, but followed a similar trajectory). Holmes, who is generally underrated I feel, was just a bigger and better southpaw and was all wrong for Taylor.

    Either way, he was the type of guy that a mid 90s Roy would either toy with or blow away.