Quite a few dodgy decisions in Eddie Hearn promoted fights recently

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Hattonmad, Nov 27, 2013.


  1. Jquik

    Jquik Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,504
    0
    Mar 31, 2013
    The Brian Rose Javier Maciel fight was a ****ing disgrace.

    Think you need a new pair of glasses mate.
     
  2. second to none

    second to none Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,438
    8
    Jul 1, 2013
    Are people seriously only waking up to this now, Hearn is a crook his fighters get easy gifts and people slag Frank for not giving his fighters tough fights, who has Eddie made Brook fight, Quigg fighting a guy ranked 88th, Frank has brought Lacey, Kovalev, prime Kessler, Tszyu over to the UK to be fair he puts up his own money, with the hearns its either an easy defence at home, or if you have a tough fight you go abroad, Barker, Bellew, Brook will be in America, the Hearns don't care about boxing just the money it makes them and they use all the dirty tricks to insure they never loose out financially.
     
  3. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Terminator you make your points very well. If this is even half true then its time for a legal investigation, bigtime.
    Anyone concerned about crookery in the Sturm-Barker fight?
    If I was Felix Sturm I'd be a worried man, and not about the opponent either..
     
  4. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    I wouldn't blame Hearn for bad decisions, just as I don't blame F.W. for things like Enzo getting saved by an early round. The timekeeper ****ed it up, but you can't jump to conclusions that people are being bribed!

    As for whether Hearn has unethically approached people under contract, and incited them to break their contract... that's more of a question I think.