R.A.The Rugged Man on Pac vs Clottey

you usally have good insight an i like some of your sarcasm but me im no fanboy or nuthugger an i know fighting guys with 15plus losses is standard in youg fighters progression manny faught one with 30 losses an floyd faught 4or5 with 15 plus losses an at times they faught them understandable that said genero beat five or 6 former or current champs before fighting oscar an floyd making him top notch just floyd an oscar were on different level at time

 

I honestly don't even remember why this came up.

What was this over?

OHHH yeah

clottey vs genaro historically speaking.

You might have a good point, but clottey has been robbed a couple of times of some HUGE wins.
Genaro lost his.

 

Why are you given as much importance to this guy?

 

Let's see... that pile of **** Mayorga beat Vernon Forrest, who beat that other pile of **** Shane Mosley two times. Of course, you were not following Forrest or Mosley either because they weren't ****. That pile of **** Mayorga did something Clottey has never done as well: take a belt from a reigning champion. So if Mayorga is a pile of ****, what does that make Clottey?

Cory Spinks was the lineal champion at 147, but of course, you weren't following that because you do not pay attention to the welterweight division apparently. Don't need to follow a boxer to know who is the damn champion of an entire division!!! Especially one as popular as welterweight.


Nice deflection from the fact that you don't know **** about boxing. Of course, most of us knew that already.

 

What's this have to do with who I decide to follow?
How are you going to dictate who I decide to watch and not?

Give me a ****ing break you whiners.

 

Nice deflection from the fact that you don't know **** about boxing. Of course, most of us knew that already.

 

Clearly.

As opposed to you and all your friends on this forum who display supreme boxing knowledge regularly.

This conversation needs to go somewhere I give a **** about, and bringing up cory spinks and mayorga won't do it for me.

 

Nice deflection from the fact that you don't know **** about boxing. Of course, most of us knew that already.

 

Clearly.

As opposed to you and all your friends on this forum who display supreme boxing knowledge regularly.

This conversation needs to go somewhere I give a **** about, and bringing up cory spinks and mayorga won't do it for me.

Circular logic is fun.

 

Also, from a guy who thinks floyd mayweather is going to end up being greater than roberto duran.....

Best of all time: Pound for Pound
Views: 1,600
Posted By victor879
Re: Best of all time: Pound for Pound

Good points here. Well I guess we'll have to see if Mayweather adds a couple more big names to his resume. Perhaps I was jumping the gun a bit... but I do see Floyd surpassing Duran when it's all...

 

You're absolutely right I should have known better.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJeCcHD5NWQ[/ame]

 

Good ****. I couldn't have said it better myself.

 

Posted By Sweet Jones
Re: Has anyone clearly lost by Compubox numbers, but deservedly won the fight?

Mayweather v. Castillo I
Dawson v. Glen Johnson I



Any other mayweather dick suckers want to show face?

 

And I stand by my statement. If he beats Mosley, if Pacman mans up, and he decides to move up and somehow gets a middleweight strap, I think an argument could be made for him. It certainly is not out of the realm of possibility in my opinion. I think most people would have Mayweather in their top 50 all-time, so what he does now at the end of his career is important to his overall standing. Like it or not, Mayweather is considered an ATG fighter by most rational people. Where you rank him on the list is a "matter of opinion."

Of course, that still does not excuse YOU from not knowing 3 lineal welterweight champions in a row or the fact that these guys fought and titles changed hands several times. This is a matter of "fact." In fact, this also displays a complete lack of knowledge of the history of recent/modern boxing. I can conclude from this that you are nothing but a ******* fanboy who just started watching boxing or have done a lot of Boxrec.com studying and trying to pass that off as boxing knowledge.

For somebody who doesn't care about what I say (according to you) I find it flattering you took the time to look through my post history. :deal