R boxers who play chess better at strategy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by john garfield, Oct 20, 2010.


  1. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
  2. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Not sure, JG. a lot of people liken this "mental cross training" to the whole calligraphy-swordsmanship thing. I guess it would really depend on how quickly you play too. Boxing's a chess match, but it happens at light speed.
     
  3. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    hehehe right... of course it doesn't transfer. What transfer is the attitude, that is boxers who play chess are more likely to be more reserved and reflexive about their boxing than boxers who don't play chess at all.
     
  4. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    i don't think so. chess is all mental. in boxing, you need to have good coordination to quickly execute your moves. physically and mentally, you have to be sharp. whereas in chess you have ample time to read your opponent's moves, in boxing it's all instantaneous. so i don't think switching between the two would be advantageous for boxers.
     
  5. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Fighters who are more cerebral in the ring are probably more likely to be attracted to strategy games than say a balls to the wall slugger.
     
  6. BoxerGaz

    BoxerGaz East Side Boxing VIP Full Member

    3,817
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    I personally dont see how it helps but there you go..

    G
     
  7. aramini

    aramini Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    7
    Sep 15, 2004
    No relation at all from my experience. I am mostly a swarmer against experienced guys but I can outbox and outstrategize guys of medium experience. There is a guy who was training with me for a while. I had a lot more education and a lot more raw intelligence, but he beat my ass at chess every single time we played badly. Badly. And I'm ok at chess.

    However, when we sparred my strategies completely confounded him. There is another work out partner I had who was strategically superior to me in the ring in every way, but I beat him at chess pretty much every time we played. Against him I was relegated to swarming and trying to utilize my physical attributes because his strategy was always superior to mine. Its not a huge sample group but I have played chess against two of my regular sparring partners, and the one who sucked at chess was the superior strategist in the ring, whereas the other was kind of helpless against me even though he outweighed me by about thirty pounds.
     
  8. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    I dont think so, kinda like saying people who play football should have great footwork.
     
  9. Atritionist

    Atritionist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,473
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43Wcbd0dJpQ&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43Wcbd0dJpQ&feature=related[/ame]
     
  10. paddymickey

    paddymickey Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,532
    17
    Dec 5, 2008
    Dimitry Pirog is known for being a brilliant chess player apar from his recent 160 belt!
    I think what I have seen from those who do both is similar traits in terms of passive/aggressive/neutral style.
    I know for example in chess that I like defensive openings or neutral openings and in boxing I definitely would be considered a counter puncher. I am pretty sure that Rigon Deaux would play chess similar to me. I'm also pretty sure that someone like Arthur Abraham would play chess by using more defensive openings. I imagine on the flip side that boxers like Hatton/Tyson/Lopez would be the type to try and attack in chess as early as possible and may even not bother to castle for example! But that said - I ont think the strategic mindset is necessarily similar. I wonder though if good jabbers use good pawn strategy lol
     
  11. slickstylez

    slickstylez Member Full Member

    248
    0
    Aug 17, 2010
    i like how everyone is giving detailed philosophical paragraghs of bullsh_t
    boxing is not a board game......
     
  12. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    Of course it does. Learn to move your king without other pieces protecting it and you'll be able to drop both your hands in the ring. The full force of the queen is directly transferable to one-punch KO power. Players preferring the knights have great uppercuts while the bishop specialists have awesome right and left crosses. Kill too much time with the stupid pawns and you'll gonna turn into a safety first jabber. Bernard Hopkins needs to play with the black pieces to motivate himself and prove his point to the naysayers, and he'll never let a white playing boy beat him.

    Jokes aside, I can't really answer, but some boxers do play chess and they are usually pretty smart in the ring though it might be the other way around: smart boxers with good strategic thinking rather play chess than dumb ones because they actually can be good at it.
     
  13. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    You must be an mma fan, so you wouldn't understand. Boxing is deeper than just throwing punches, you need to think 2-3 moves ahead of your opponent... just like Chess
     
  14. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Not sure about strategy, but anything that keeps you mentally sharp is sure to translate into the ring.
     
  15. Boxers who play Wii develop KO power in their index fingers.