Ramirez vs. Whitaker 1

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Nov 4, 2011.


  1. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    I saw somebody post that Ramirez deserved the decision in their bout. How many others feel that same way? I didn't see it that way at all but I want other opinions.
     
  2. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Popkins?

    I seriously doubt he meant that.
     
  3. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Yes that is the quote I was referring to. I honestly didn't see the fight that way AT all. I saw it as yet another time he was robbed.
     
  4. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    Ramirez won at most 2 rounds. It was a complete schooling and one of the biggest robberies ever.
     
  5. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Well let's get him in here so he can explain.


    POPKINS!!!!!!
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,200
    21,707
    Sep 15, 2009
    Domination by pea.
     
  7. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    23
    Mar 28, 2008
    If it was the Popkins quote, then yeah, he was probably being sarcastic. From what I've seen, Popkins is much too sensible to say that and mean it. (Of course, I could be wrong...)

    Personally, I think you pretty much have to fall into one of two categories to truly believe Ramirez won that fight: you either have to hate defensive fighting to the extent that you think it's impossible to win a match while going backwards, or you have to blinded by nationalism/fanboyism.

    Even for the very few guys that I've seen argue that either Ramirez or Chavez beat Whitaker, that's generally what it comes down to as far as reasons go.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,450
    45,959
    Feb 11, 2005
    I had Ramirez by 2 points.
     
  9. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    You jest Seamus.. right? lol
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,450
    45,959
    Feb 11, 2005
    Ring Generalship, body work, execution of a game plan, cheers from the crowd...

    Carriage.
     
  11. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    You're right buddy Pea did those things very well in the fight.. good point :)
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,450
    45,959
    Feb 11, 2005
    Oh, and I forgot my highest criteria... Hair.
     
  13. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Popkins was being sarcastic. However, Frankenfrank seems to believe that not only did Ramirez win the first fight, but the rematch as well. I asked him to explain himself and I don't think he ever really did, or if he did I don't think I could make out what he was trying to say given his posting style. "d Witaccre ran d hole fight aganst d Ramirez"
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Popkins been boxrec busy
     
  15. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Ramirez won because he was d aggressor and Whitaker didn't do any damage , only ran for his dear life . 2nd fight was closer than d 1st , but Ramirez still won . 1 can't win by running all d time and not doing damage .
    D fact that Whitaker won d running contest doesn't turn d fight in2 such .