Random drug testing is effective in Europe - Sauerland mandates random testing!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Jan 22, 2010.


Page 1 of 7
  1. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,464
    1,726
    Nov 20, 2007
    Update: Team Sauerland mandates random drug testing for his shows!

    German stable Sauerland Event just signed a new TV deal with ARD, and it mandates random drug testing for all boxers fighting on Sauerland events.

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    IBF MW champion Sebastian Sylvester has to find a new opponent for his January 30 fight in Germany, because Spanish challenger [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Pablo Navascues was tested positive for an unnamed illegal substance following a random test.

    Ironically, the test was performed on January 13, around the 14 day window Mayweather and Pacquiao couldn't agree on in their own fight. The test results became public by the Austrian Boxing Federation on Thursday, 8 days after the test, both A and B samples were positive. There was no information whether it was a blood or urine test, but you can bet if it was not random or was performed after the fight, Navascues wouldn't have got caught.

    RANDOM DRUG TESTING IS IN EFFECT AND WORKING WELL IN EUROPE!

    UNITED STATES ATHLETIC COMMISSIONS MUST MAKE RANDOM DRUG TESTING MANDATORY BECAUSE IT'S THE ONLY WAY TO GET FIGHTERS CAUGHT USING!
    [/FONT]
     
    BigBone, Jan 22, 2010
    BigBone, Jan 22, 2010
    #1
  2. jjax

    jjax Active Member Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    ******* response:

    IBF, Sylvester, Austrian Boxing Federation, and the entire nation of Germany, is being bribed by GBP.
     
    jjax, Jan 22, 2010
    jjax, Jan 22, 2010
    #2
  3. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    they didn't say if it was blood or urine
     
    BOSTONREDSOX, Jan 22, 2010
    BOSTONREDSOX, Jan 22, 2010
    #3
  4. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,464
    1,726
    Nov 20, 2007
    Doesn't matter. It must be a blood test to be fully effective, urine testing is ineffective for EPO for example, even if it was random, Mosley would've passed a urine test before the De La Hoya fight. Shane wouldn't have passed the blood test. Of course there was neither.

    RANDOM BLOOD TESTING IS THE ONLY TRULY EFFECTIVE WAY OF TESTING, AND RANDOM TESTING IS IN USE AND WORKING WELL IN MANY PLACES OF THE WORLD!
     
    BigBone, Jan 22, 2010
    BigBone, Jan 22, 2010
    #4
  5. deeta

    deeta Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Dec 5, 2009
    dude you just owned your self. you basically said that you coudlnt tell if it was urine or blood testing that caught him. yet part of your conclusion is that random blood testing is needed because it will show substances that urine cant.
     
    deeta, Jan 22, 2010
    deeta, Jan 22, 2010
    #5
  6. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    This is a perfect example of why random blood testing is needed. I'm glad they're starting this in Europe this will have cheats on the run.
     
    Pimp C, Jan 22, 2010
    Pimp C, Jan 22, 2010
    #6
  7. deeta

    deeta Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Dec 5, 2009
    " There was no information whether it was a blood or urine test"

    What example? point was random testing...not sure if it was random urine testing or random blood testing. you can say that once they say that it was because of blood testing
     
    deeta, Jan 22, 2010
    deeta, Jan 22, 2010
    #7
  8. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    Great news!

    Although im sure Pac will counter this with his argument of
    "Hmmmm ummmmm i punch.....
     
    saul_ir34, Jan 22, 2010
    saul_ir34, Jan 22, 2010
    #8
  9. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    :rofl:rofl
    bunch of illiterate goons
     
    BOSTONREDSOX, Jan 22, 2010
    BOSTONREDSOX, Jan 22, 2010
    #9
  10. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    The best type of testing is RANDOM URINE and BLOOD testing. Is PBF the Jose Conseco of Boxing?
     
    JASPER, Jan 22, 2010
    JASPER, Jan 22, 2010
    #10
  11. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    The USADA have already said blood tests are needed as urine doesn't pick up everything, if Navascues failed a urine test it won't change that fact.
     
    Toontoon, Jan 22, 2010
    Toontoon, Jan 22, 2010
    #11
  12. r2d2

    r2d2 HATERS GONNA HATE! Full Member

    1,534
    0
    May 4, 2009

    did you say youre a counselor of a community college? youre the dumbest one ive ever known.....you dont even have the comprehension or least learn to understand of what youre reading.
     
    r2d2, Jan 22, 2010
    r2d2, Jan 22, 2010
    #12
  13. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    random blood testing should be implemented in boxing but not under the usda i heard they really mean random as in middle of the night random.
     
    Relentless, Jan 22, 2010
    Relentless, Jan 22, 2010
    #13
  14. deeta

    deeta Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Dec 5, 2009
    you dont get it do you. TS is saying that this news proves that random blood testing is needed when he said himself that there was no information whether it was blood or urine that caught that boxer.
     
    deeta, Jan 22, 2010
    deeta, Jan 22, 2010
    #14
  15. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009

    I love how *******s think. Throw them some facts and they turn borderline ******ed or ignore the fact completely and instead turn to insults.
     
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Jan 22, 2010
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Jan 22, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 7