Rank the Black Murderer's Row of the 30's and 40's

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Pea, Feb 11, 2009.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    I'm going to have a go (excluding the future HWs Charles/Moore/Bivins), with resume and achievements in context. I have a bias towards Burley though :D

    Charley Burley (Moore, deserved the series against Holman and Zivic, Chase, Smith, Wade multiple times despite being the natural WW held his own against Charles/Bivins/Marshall)

    Holman Williams (extra points for starting at LW and holding his own in the Burley series, beat Marshall (winning the series 2-1), Chase, Cocoa Kid, going 1-1 with Archies Moore, 146wins. 34 and 150+ fights behind him when he gave Lamotta and Cerdan closish fights

    Eddie Booker - stoppage win over Moore (before Burley) and a draw, 1-1-1 with Williams, beat Marshall

    Lloyd Marshall - some may argue he should be higher with wins over Young/Green Ezzard Charles (before being ko'd twice by Ezzard), SD against Burley, Lamotta, Old Williams (lost 1-2), Chase, BUT Marshall was a natural SMW/LHW so had a weight advantage and when Moore and Charles were coming into their own was dominated twice by each

    Bert Lytell - went 1-1 with a fading Burley, twice beat Williams (past prime but drew and lost prior to that), wins over Cocoa kid and Wade, other than that didnt face the other top fighters of the day

    Cocoa Kid - got the better of Holman Williams time and again, for the most part seemed to lose against the better fighters, did start as a LW and then WW and kudos has to be given for fighting the big names from LW to LHW

    Jack Chase

    Aaron Wade
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    i will have a look for it
     
  3. stevebhoy87

    stevebhoy87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,304
    6
    Dec 7, 2007
    Will second that, probably the best boxing book i've read and gives a brilliant overview of the period.
     
  4. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    i will definitly look for it then
     
  5. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,641
    735
    May 22, 2007
    This is tought to rank but I have a go
    1. Charley Burley
    2. Holman Williams
    3. Lloyd Marhsall
    4. Cocoa Kid/ Eddie Booker
    5. Jack Chase
    6. Bert Lytell
    7. Aaron Wade

    If you include Bivins he would be number 4 the top three are very close pretty much interchangeable.
     
  6. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    I'd probably rate Marshall and Williams as the best of them.

    Then Burley and Booker right after them.

    Then Chase, and then the rest.

    If Bivins was on that list, he'd be the best of them all IMO.
     
  7. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    36,578
    21,295
    Jul 29, 2004
    I got Burley the highest to tell you the truth. Around 30-35 from memory.

    Williams and Marshall make my top 100..Cocoa Kid and Booker made it into my top120 but got pushed out. Whether they deserved to be or not Im not sure because I dont know enough about them..So I was probably being a little unfair and uninformed by putting some guys Im more familiar with in front.

    I really do not know much about Wade or Lytell, other than just being familiar with their names...Ive been inspired to look into them more now.

    Interesting thread.
     
  8. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    Booker is the most underrated of them IMO. He might well have been on his way to being the best of them, except his career ended abruptly on an eye injury. Even with the eye already injured, he KO'd Archie Moore in one of his last fights. He was never stopped or KO'd himself, and reportedly was undefeated in his first 40-50 fights or so.

    I always found it strange and a bit unfair, that Charley Burley gets so celebrated for his decision win over Moore (it really is the backbone of his legacy), yet Booker's own win over Moore - the first time that Moore was ever KO'd - a couple months before Burley beat him, is almost totally forgotten. You'd think the story of a "one-eyed" fighter KOing Archie Moore shortly before being forced to retire is something that would be talked about a lot more than it is.
     
  9. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Charley Burley was an exceptional fighter. Definately cracks my top 25 of all-time.

    Ridiculous that Lloyd Marshall isn't in the IBHOF, his resume is outstanding.
     
  10. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    36,578
    21,295
    Jul 29, 2004
    And Barry McGuigan is..:-(

    The credibility of that particular organization is quickly dissipating in my eyes.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,821
    51,899
    Mar 21, 2007

    The trickiest one is Booker.

    Booker is named, consistantly, amongst the very best some guy has seen/fought. Moore rated him almost as high as Burley. He beat Moore, Williams, Hogue, Marshall, Jannazzo, you know who he beat, but it's troubling how much he struggled with the best he fought - he also lost to Hogue, lost to Cocoa Kid, lost and seemed to have difficult imposing himself upon decent opponents who he was edging ahead of - lots of draws.

    But there's more than that.

    Booker did a lot of fighting in Calafornia, at the exact time when fights in Calafornia were being fixed. There may never have been such a horrible intersection of time and place in terms of fixed fights. This makes things harder, much harder.

    Booker is unlikely to have profited by this arrangement, he was at the very least a master boxer with no political power behind him, like you say, a guy who would fight anyone, who got above 175, who was never stopped, but he is also likely to have been cuffed. It's likely that Booker involved in fights where he was cuffed - Big Boy Hogue and Cocoa Kid are examples of business fighters he lost/drew with. Now these results could be straight up. There's no proof they were fixed. But for sure, Booker's loss to the excellent Jack Chase does not stack up with his reputation amongst his peers.

    There are even mutters that Burley ducked him.

    Defensive master. There may very well be great, great HW's that would not beat him. For footage, I'd gut you, whoever you are, reading this.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,821
    51,899
    Mar 21, 2007
    Here's the way I do it, with no apologies for the reaching.

    Charley Burley
    Holman Williams
    Lloyd Marshall
    Eddie Booker
    Bert Lytell
    Jack Chase
    Aaron Wade
    Cocoa Kid
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,821
    51,899
    Mar 21, 2007

    Smith was a really big punching light-heavyweight, avoided himself. Strange mother-****er, once ran out of the ring when he was fighting Moore:lol:

    Burley's a welterweight. Smith was a big punching ranked light-heavy and Burley bosses him. The mind boogles, really. Imagine Cotto bullying Tarver.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,821
    51,899
    Mar 21, 2007

    One of the best one-two's in the history of the sport, I think.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,821
    51,899
    Mar 21, 2007
    All time -

    Burley, 15
    Williams, 40
    Marshall, 61
    Booker, around 100

    I actually rated Cocoa Kid around the same sort of slot as Booker for a long time, but I just lost patience with him. He's about as tough as Booker to rate, because he was diving *******. His dive against Smith is one of the most notoriously bad in history.