Wrong. I am in a position to do something about trolls derailing my thread with their stupid partisan agendas, so I am.
Let's say a fella entered a man's home and was told "hey please keep your muddy boots off my dinner table". Guest says "fuck you!" and puts his feet up. Is asked several more times please to put them down. Scuffs a bit of muck off the heel on the corner. You'd consider it "bad" that he then get booted?
Sulecki is a very good fighter, similar to Vanes Martirosyan (when he doesn't dive). Throws tons of punches, and has a lot of skill He gives loads of people trouble especially low out put guys like Andrade and Lara.
@CST80 Isn't bypassing the word filter a bannable offense? Or are you now the site owner and make your own rules as you go?
What's the relationship between the man entering the house and the homeowner ??? Anybody else in the house whilst this is going on ?
Jacobs. Considering I had him beating Golovkin(by only a round) and thought Canelo lost both fights clearly. This is in a sane world without BS decisions and other shenanigans. Canelo I think is probably the last man standing with a questionable decision or two along the way.
Charlo Canelo Dervo Brant Jacobs Andrande. Nobody wants to fight Charlo for a reason. Crushing explosive power. A very dangerous left hook. Size , speed and workrate too. Canelo would struggle to keep him off him and Jacobs wouldn't be able to hold up to the punishment that would definitely be inflicted on him. Dervo could reach #1 or #2 if he looks good Saturday.
It would really depend on the draw. For example, I think Jacobs matches extremely favorably against Canelo, but not so much against Deevo. Conversely, I think Canelo vs. Derev would be a great bout that could go either way, but I'd favor Canelo whereas I favor Dero on Saturday over Jacobs. Those are my top three, with the order depending entirely upon the draw. Draw be damned, I think I'd go: 1. Jacobs 2. Canelo 3. Derev 4. Andrade 5. Charlo 6. Brant
Wrong answer. You don't require any of that information. You already had everything you needed to come up with the correct answer. Booting a GUEST for not following the house rules is the prerogative of the homeowner, always. My fucking thread, my fucking house...my fucking rules. And yes I bypass the word filter whenever the fuck I want, because I am this place's maverick, and what any of you think about that being a double standard means less to me than a wet yeasty cunt fart. (hear that IsaL? Go ahead, whine, report me...waste your stupid fucking time...cry me a salty bean-flavored river...) This is, bottom line, MY thread. Whatever standards of propriety I dictate for it are mine to enforce. Does everybody have that luxury? No. Is that "wrong", somehow? Fuck no. I happen to have that luxury that others don't, yes, but that is earned... that is because I've been here longer and contributed more than any of you. I have thus been afforded certain levels of respect that most of you haven't, and that includes honoring my stated wishes to not have my threads mucked up with trolling content - especially when my expectations are spelled out very clearly, along with the consequences of non-compliance, followed by "asking nicely" multiple times and then issuing sterner warnings to give offenders every possible chance to alter course. If you want to come track mud through my house and then cry "abuse of power" when you are shown the door a`la DJ Jazzy Jeff on the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air - you can go ahead and feel free to find yourself another forum to post on. `
And you, wtf is this waffling above-the-fray bullshit? I know you're just as upset about Canelo and Boo-Boo having supplanted GGG and BJS as champions (through means other than cleanly defeating them in the ring) - and hell, so am I!!! - but at the same time I know you can recognize objectively why my avowed preference was for not dragging all that partisan agenda nonsense into my thread, and that "securing the border" of it falls well inside my rights. That, and we're supposed to get each other's backs when the civilians are blatantly mouthing off to us and flaunting how much they can skirt the line and "get away with", no? The fact that you ideologically may happen to agree with uttb and CTF in terms of being outraged about that pair of particular MW titles changing hands under the circumstances they did - but objectively, you know damn well the right thing here is supporting my "NO TRESPASSING" sign on my thread's front lawn and keeping it strictly to discussion of those presently holding world titles, as explicitly lain out in the OP.