Rank them 1-4 on overall ability: Napoles, Gomez, Benitez, Mayweather

Sorry Mr Morlocks, have I offended you? Or should I just file the above post under 'Utter **** Posts By The Morlocks'?

Or is it because I actually back up my posts with knowledge?

Also, do you make up your own witty repostes or steal them from Anarci? Or are you just a pseudonym?

 

Like I said, If you say it Princess, IT MUST BE RIGHT. Because you have all the years and exper. TO BACK IT UP. So from now on, Princess Fleamna's word is the final word. Like you told the one guy to serve an apprenteessship in Genereal Forum. Nobody bring their weakass, lived through the times and boxing eras to Princess Fleaman, he knows by youtube and boxrec the real truth. What the hell does seeing live and reading deeply on subjects matter against his 20 years or so of life and probably 5 years of boxing interest? YOU THE MAN PRINCESS, and don't ANYONE forget it!

 

get ****ed you ******ed nonce

 

1. Napoles
2. Gomez
3. Benitez
4. Mayweather
As much in awe of the 122 lb. king Gomez as I am, Napoles was in a class of his own...just barring his problem of ccutting around the eyes, he was virtually invincible. As gifted as Benitez was, his powers were with him for such a short time...and Floyd isn't in the top 3's class. I don't like Floyd, which probably clouds my judgement sometimes, but not in this particular case.

 

Such language Princess. Well, if you say it, I better or else.

 

At the end of the day pal, you only post useless bollocks.

The TS Eliot reply is a cracking example.

This is a forum (and this board in particular) for genuine discussion about boxing. You don't seem to offer that, hence why I flame you.

 

Oh, I have no doubt you are a FLAMER Princess!

 

I rest my case.

 

It's just good to know that there is someone out there like you to squelch those who offer firsthand knowledge of the sport. What do the boards need w/ people who live thru and went to the fights and offer experiences that dealt firsthand with the fights and fighters. I say, run them all off Princess and let them know that you and you alone can judge the merit of the posts on these boards. If you say it, it must be. So judge on your highness.

 

Napoles on top for me, Benitez and Gomez are hard to chose from and Floyd is just behind them....although he still had a few fights left in him yet.

I'll go with

Jose Napoles

Wilfredo Gomez
Wilfred Benitez
Floyd Mayweather Jr



Good thread.

 

No I don't. I object to people who just post bollocks like you.

Which 'first hand' experience do you offer? All you seem to do is clog up threads with ****:deal

 

Another judgement from on high by the Princess. Thank you sir, I am beginning to see the error of my ways. Have you ever read the posts about the fights and fighters I saw that I wrote about. I know it was beneath you, but if you had, you would see my experience. But compared to you, we are all serfs awaiting judgment. It should not be caklled Classic Forum, but Princess Fleaman's own personal forum. Forgive me sir for speaking out of line. YOU ARE RIGHT! YOU ARE ALWAYS RIGHT AND NOONE BETTER FORGET IT!

 

Back to the main thread topic.

As i have it

again SNAP

1. Napoles. The smoothest fighter that ever lived. Amazing ability to combine offence and defence almost equally whilst being an offensive counter puncher. Add in his formidable power, good chin, reasonable speed and amazing ring generalship and you have a complete package. One thing I love about Napoles is his counter right hand to the body. The Cokes fight displays his full arsenal.

2. Gomez. The second smoothest fighter that ever lived. At time I watch him and really do think he was the greatest fighter since Ray Robinson then the next time he dosent look so electric but showcases his intangibles that make him great. I think what marks him down here is his inconsistancy where he can look amazing against Zarate and Davila but then he takes a beating from Sanchez and struggles with Pintor, still no shame in that. As mentioned the Davila fight or the Zarate fight is his signature performances.

3. Benitez. My favrouite fighter on this list. Just pure amazingness. His defence is almost unrivalled with superb timing, judgement of distance and reflexes. When on form he was nigh impossible to hit. Watch the 14th round of the Palomino fight where he sits on the ropes. His lackadasical moments frustrate the hell out of me and his chin lets him down slightly at times. But by gosh he was some fighter. I would say the Cervantez or Palomino fights showcase his skills at the highest class but the destruction of Randy Sheilds is flawless.

4. Mayweather. Not as tested as the other lot and has showcased skills to be discussed among these greats but just hasnt displayed his skills on the level these men did. Although even if he had I still think he would be in this position. In his prime down at Super Featherweight, Floyd was an awesome fighter. Quick darting movements, super fast combinations, excellant defensive manuevers and upper body movement. His best performance is definitly the Corrales destruction where he showcases his full repertoi.

 

Is The Morlocks hegrant or does he just like his insults?

Based on the way he talks it could be. But I don't know for sure. All I know is they sound rather similar, and use the same silly insults.

 

He's just another guy to add to the list of posters who think I'm a dick :good

I don't believe I've fallen out with he grant before to be honest.