1 - Canelo 2 - Morales 3 - Barrera 4 - JMM A past it Barrera almost beat JMM. A past it Morales beat Pacquiao.
that's unfair, canelo's career is not over. I rate morales over the rest of them. But as I said, canelo's career is not over, he's only 30. And the OP knows it, this thread is unfair, and is unfair on purpose and is created only to generate traffic. But who cares, right? this is ESB, at least we are not hugging gigi's balls, that's a step in the right direction.
You think a win over a past his prime GGG is that meaningful. Who is the only man in boxing history to beat a prime Pacquiao?
The most damning loss there is Barrera's to Junior Jones (x2), but balanced against wins over Mckinney, Morales (x2) and Hamed it's a forgivable eyesore. Marquez's losses to Norwood and John were just as debatable as Lara's to Canelo. All real close. Morales lost to Raheem after fighting Barrera and Pacquiao back-to-back. He was battle-worn at that point. It's good to see Canelo active, and he's great to watch, but he's navigating much calmer waters. The best thing you can say about him is that (barring Floyd) nobody has really bested him, but then he hasn't captured the imagination like the others did. Teddy Atlas gets criticized when he goes down this route but I know what he's getting at. Had Canelo fought Golovkin earlier, and clearly beaten him, then the praise he's getting would sit much better.
Pacroid needed peds and secret shakes to beat past prime Barrera, Morales and robbed Marquez not once but 3 times needed loaded gloves against Margarito that damaged his eye for life
Luis Nery caught cheating. Clenelo caught cheating. Morales caught cheating. JMM obviously juiced to the gills in 3 and 4. Mexico obviously has a PED problem. DEAL WITH IT, FAT BOY.