Rank these attributes in order of their importance to greatness

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Mar 19, 2019.


  1. BundiniBlack

    BundiniBlack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,555
    412
    May 20, 2015
    Footwork chin consistency and ring IQ are the most important
     
  2. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    0-Luck/chance (This is actually a bigger factor than some would want to believe. Both in the ring and out. Maybe a lucky slip prevented you from taking a huge shot. Maybe a clash of heads was in a better place than it could've been. Maybe a ref didn't see a low blow that you could've gotten a point taken away. You could also be lucky to face a fighter when he was in bad form. Maybe a venue that was picked was good for you in a variety of ways. Maybe you were fortunate an injury you got in training wasn't as bad as it could've been) Point is, there is a saying, and it has some truth to it. It's better to be lucky than good.

    1-Ring IQ and the ability to adapt on the fly
    2-punching precision and accuracy
    3-professionalism and consistency - mental toughness (To me these are mostly the same, so I combined them)
    4-punching power
    5-durability and chin
    6-defensive abilities (reflexes and technique)
    7-handspeed
    8-mobility/footwork
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    I think you nailed it regarding the importance of luck and chance.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,726
    Feb 26, 2009
    Handspeed
    Ring IQ
    defensive ability which goes hand in hand with mobility footwork,
    mobility footwork
    professionalism
    mental toughness
    punching power
     
  5. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,498
    Jan 22, 2009
    Provocative thread, Kevin. Nicely done. However, I believe good stamina should be in the mix as well. For the threads sake, shall we lump it in with durability?
     
    mrkoolkevin and roughdiamond like this.
  6. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,469
    9,482
    Oct 22, 2015
    #1Ring IQ, #2 professionalism, consistence,#3 Mental toughness , #4,accuracy,precision#5 chin,#6 speed,#7 defensive ability, #8 speed#9 power,#10 mobility/foot work. I see it this way, throughout the long,long history of boxing their have been thousands of fighters that were super fast, super powerful, defensive wizards, unbreakable chins/wills but most were never heard of. But the 3 consistent attributes of ATG'S were ring IQ, professionalism, mental toughness. A great example of this would be Marciano. Sure he wasn't the quickest on his feet, but he consistently cut opponents off(ring IQ) Always was in peak physical condition(professional/consistent , was short with short arms, took some to give some, cut but couldn't be discouraged (mental toughness) His power was the equalizer that covered his other weaknesses like mobility,hand speed etc.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2019
    mrkoolkevin and roughdiamond like this.
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    I dropped the ball on that one. I think it's different than durability. Feel free to add it to your rankings...
     
    Clinton and roughdiamond like this.
  8. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    But other than someone like Marciano, who fought through a lot of punishment because of his physical and defensive limitations, how do we know whether a particular fighter has exceptional mental toughness? Not sure I'd really use that term to describe Tunney, Louis, Liston, Ali, Tyson, etc., for example.
     
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    So you think that handspeed is the most important attribute? What about precision and accuracy?
     
  10. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,653
    11,516
    Mar 23, 2019
    The biggest one is missing here imo: Heart. The ability to scrape oneself off the floor, sublimate your fear, and fight back as hard as you can no matter how bad things look. To me there is nothing even close to that. It's what Liston and Tyson didn't have, and what Marciano and Louis had in spades.

    There is no replacement for a champion's heart.
     
  11. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Heart or no heart, I'd still expect either of them to punish Marciano and stop him brutally, but fair enough. I understand why "heart" is so highly revered in discussions of boxing greatness. I see it as being intertwined with "mental toughness" though, so I'm going to edit the original list to reflect that.
     
  12. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,653
    11,516
    Mar 23, 2019
    As long as you mean it as a synonym.

    To be honest, I expected heart to have been brought up way before I did. All the old boxing fans and trainers I know talk about it, it's far from a niche term in the sport.

    Whether Tyson and Liston could have stopped Marciano or not doesn't matter to me. You can bet he would have fought until he was paralyzed. That to me makes him a great fighter. Strip away Ali's unbelievable speed, ring smarts and generalship and he's still got one of the greatest hearts a true champion could ever have. Same with Holmes. Same with Louis.

    Marciano was great btw, but he was mostly an example of a fighter whom was practically all heart, very little ability. Still he did retire undefeated, and no one has done that before or since...I don't care what people think of his competition. He wasn't my favorite fighter by a long chalk, but that record can't be taken lightly, and neither can his heart. Marciano was just plain a greater champion than either Tyson or Liston for precisely that last reason. The last two just simply fought a lot better.

    Without heart, you're a bully, not a champion. 70s Foreman could be argued to have had no heart...that all changed when he came back, in a BIG way (pun intended).

    This is all just worthless conjecture on my part, but it's how I feel.
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Heart already did come up earlier.

    Don't forget that Marciano also had very good punching power (great to some), and unsurpassed stamina. Without those things, which at least to some extent reflect god-given physical gifts, his heart wouldn't have gotten him very far.
     
  14. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,653
    11,516
    Mar 23, 2019
    He was a very, very good puncher. He wasn't Foreman, Frazier, Liston, or even Joe Louis though (I'm sure you know that).
     
  15. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,726
    Feb 26, 2009
    I could say if you say precision and accuracy is more important, what if the person takes 10 seconds to start the punch and land it? Wouldn't handspeed be better? If a guy has handspeed, he will learn to be sharp and work with it. . That is a given. The question was what was the most important thing. . Handspeed is what defines most great fighters... Makes it easier for them to dominate.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2019