Rank these fighters in regards to how entertaining they are/were in the ring??

Benn

Naz

Haye

Froch

Hatton

Calzaghe

Eubank

Witter

Fury


Nothing really in positions 3-9

 

Naz
Benn
Eubank
Hatton
Froch
Khan
Calzaghe
Haye
Fury
Witter​

You can nearly rate them in two's. Football league wise.

Edit - cheers Wallet.​

 

Khan above Froch? I can't understand that.

 

You know when you really REALLY didn't mean that. Well thats one. I've reversed it.

 

Benn - always up for a war, aggressive style, had a rivalry with Eubank, plenty of exciting fights on resume

Naz - entertainer, had power but had vulnerabilities as well. Unpredictable, kelly fight was brilliant and has a few others on resume too.

Froch - aggressive style, dramatic bout with Taylor as well as many others, always willing to go into 50/50 fights.

Hatton - had some really exciting fights but also had ahis share of stinkers (malignaggi one of the worst ive sat through). Liked to come forward and brawl at times.

Eubank - had a good rivalry with Benn, watson and Collins, was a character but had some borefests as well.

Calzaghe - had some good fights but a lot of them were gimmees, had some good bouts such as kessler and mitchell but also the boring fights such as Bika and Ashira.


Khan - had an awesome bout with Maidana as well as some early stuff with the likes of Gomez, Limond etc but had some super bores in McClosky and kotelnik. Plenty time though although fighting Mayweather probably won't be a thriller.

Haye - at cruiserweight he was worth watching, was up for the big fights and had some good fights/events with Mormeck, Fragotelli and Macaronelli. heavyweight haye was not only boring but in poor match-ups which it was hard to get up for.

Fury - still fresh but plenty of time, had some decent fights with McDermott, Chisora and Firtha but is a bit clumsy and will prob be dragged into cuddlefests as he works up the ladder- jurys still out.

Witter - cant thin k of an exciting witter fight from the top of my head