Rank winning resumes of these fighters: Arguello, JC Chavez, Mayweather

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Ukrainian, Jun 9, 2016.


  1. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    Who do you think has the best list of wins between these 3 fighters?
     
  2. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    1. Mayweather
    2. Arguello
    3. Chavez


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  3. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,109
    6,927
    Sep 8, 2013
    Chavez and Arguello both have stellar resumes. Too close to call.

    Mayweather a very distant 3rd.
     
  4. Ike-Man

    Ike-Man Active Member Full Member

    879
    314
    Mar 9, 2014
    1. Arguello
    2. Chavez
    3. Mayweather
     
  5. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    Pretty sure he beat more ranked contenders, champions, and likely hof/future hof fighters. He's also consensus ranked higher than them, granted he didn't lose. He also beat four fighter who weretop 5 pfp at the time of their fights, although Mosley should've obly been bottom of the top ten. You're full of shi t.




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  6. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    This forum is supposed to be an anti-Mayweather safe space. Chill with all the facts and logic, bro.
     
  7. 2piece

    2piece Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,995
    278
    Feb 14, 2014
    Chavez actually has the record for beating the most title holders. Mayweather is a close second.
     
  8. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130711130324AAljRXR

    They say Mayweather and that was two years ago. I can't personally count it out right now. Mayweather did exist in the WBO era though, unlike Chavez.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  9. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    Well we know you're doing your bit to fvk it up for us. :lol::lol:
     
  10. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    By the way, how do you rank their resumes? And why in that order?
     
  11. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Haven't put much thought into this but my initial reaction is: Mayweather #1 by a mile, for the reasons stated above, then Chavez over Arguello by a considerable margin. Chavez and Arguello each have a ton of filler on their resumes but I rate Taylor, Rosario, Laporte, Lockridge, Roger Mayweather, etc. over Arguello's best.
     
  12. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    You rank Floyd so much higher because he hasn't losses on his record or mainly because of his win over Pac?
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    I didn't take losses into account at all. Pacquiao was a very good win but DLH, Mosley, Canelo, and Cotto are too. Not to mention Chico, JMM, and all of the naturally bigger Ring ranked fighters he fought at 147 over the years.
     
  14. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    Just wonder had Arguello beat Pryor once how it would've affected his resume? He had a chance to win the title it 4th weight division.

    And what do you think are Arguello's 5 best wins?
     
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Pryor would have been a fantastic win. Don't have a ranking of Arguello wins but I assume Boom Boom, Olivares, Ganigan, and Watt would be at or near the very top.