Rate Lennox Lewis' chin

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Wegner, Nov 6, 2012.


  1. irishny

    irishny Obsessed with Boxing banned

    15,119
    10
    May 8, 2009
    It wasnt a bigger shot though.

    Rahmans punch started back in the cheap seats! It was a wild haymaker. The one you dream of landing but rarely do.
     
  2. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,719
    1,670
    Jul 8, 2010
    It also comes from getting knocked down by natural LHWs and obese bartenders and nearly getting KOed by a middleweight.

    Fair play to him, he made a successful career of it. But his chin was nowhere near great.
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    A good chin. 7 or so. Getting dropped hard by 2 shots by B level heavies can't be ignoreod.
     
  4. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    256
    Feb 5, 2005
    You're and idiot.

    I've been watching boxing since the mid 70's and Lewis' chin was about a 7 maybe even a 7.5.

    Ever box?

    If you ever did you'd know it's the punch you don't see coming that gets you. And that's what happened in the McCall fight.
     
  5. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,515
    Sep 16, 2012
    Those shots McCall and Rahman landed on Lennox would've retired Wlad and KOed Vitali

    Especially the Rahman thunderbolt ... Corrie Sanders (Wlad's master) said that Rahman was the biggest puncher he ever faced and that Wlad couldn't even hurt him

    Lewis didn't hit the deck once from anything Vitali threw, the man with the legendary KO% as you shitschko lickers like to claim, yet Wlad gets dropped by any good, clean landing punch
     
  6. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,683
    2,624
    Sep 30, 2005
    Slightly above average, maybe a 6. Not terrible but not great either. Lewis definitely wasn't like Holyfield, Tua or Tyson in the chin department.

    Ike I. would have KO'd Lewis in a similar fashion to Byrd had he not gone crazy.
     
  7. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,719
    1,670
    Jul 8, 2010
    I doubt that they would've retired them. Both brothers, especially Wlad, have shown admirable resiliency in coming back from defeat. Unless you're talking about permanent injuries, which is rather rare from single shots.

    The shot that Rahman threw was a huge shot though, reminiscent of Shavers vs Holmes.

    I like to think I'm a pretty impartial fan; I generally try to view fighters as objectively as possible, without letting personal bias get in the way. That can sometimes be difficult when discussing Lennox and the Klitschkos in the same thread. So often it's a case of one or the other. I happen to think Lennox had a very good chin indeed, but I also think Wlad's isn't nearly as bad as it's made out. He certainly doesn't get "dropped by any good, clean landing punch" or he would have been dropped by Brewster (rematch), Peter (rematch) and Haye about three times.
     
  8. BatTheMan

    BatTheMan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,416
    0
    Jun 6, 2008
    Below average for a champion. I dont think there has ever been a heavyweight champion who was left splattered on the canvas by not one but two journeymen.
     
  9. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,719
    1,670
    Jul 8, 2010
    Lennox's main problem was complacency. In the modern heavyweight division, even an average journeyman can leave you flat on their back if you don't take them seriously. Lennox was guilty of committing that sin twice. But he also atoned (in my opinion) by fighting and beating a whose who of some of the biggest punchers the heavyweight division has ever seen.
     
  10. BatTheMan

    BatTheMan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,416
    0
    Jun 6, 2008
    Are you implying that journeymen today are somehow bigger punchers than those of the past?
     
  11. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,719
    1,670
    Jul 8, 2010
    I wouldn't call either Rahman or McCall journeymen in the first place. Even if you did, it wouldn't take away from the fact that they were extremely hard punchers.