Again, his quality of victories does not indicate that he will be competing with the largely 6'3 and above heavies of today, regardless of protein shakes.
In the previous year Valdes had beaten. Bethea no 8 McMurtry no5 DeJohn no7 x2 Three top ten ranked contenders After losing to Liston ,Valdes stopped London no 8. Alonzo Johnson beat Pastrano no5 Hunter no 6 And Jimmy Slade who beat the **** out of Cockell.
I used to watch Williams on TV on the US Saturday Night Fights. Why couldnt Williams add 20 lbs to his torso ,please explain?
Yes it is ,it isn't a Liston v Marciano comparison,though some seem determined to make it so.Anyway I'm out, have fun folks.
Yeah but Marciano's competition gets lambasted all the time because his best wins were under 200 pounds. When in reality, they were around the same size as Liston’s best opponents give or take. Liston nor Marciano ever beat anything close to a 6'6 240 pound behemoth like Anthony Joshua, but people will say Marciano stands no chance against AJ because his best opponents were under 200 pounds and he is completely untested against an elite opponent that size but will then say Liston stops AJ when the same criticisms can apply to Liston. His best wins were men under 200 pounds, none as large and strong as AJ, none of the men over 200 pounds he beat had anything close to the skill level of an AJ and Liston is completely untested against a skilled 6'6 240 pound heavyweight that can punch.
Yeah but in those days, it was common for top heavyweight contenders to be 185-200 pounds. So it's wasn't far fetched that a 180 pound light heavyweight, especially a light heavyweight champion, could move up and beat a top heavyweight contender and go back to 175. The gap in size is too much nowadays. However, if the top heavies were still 185-200 pounds, I could definitely see a Bivol, Beterbiev or Ward moving to heavyweight and being pretty good.
You think Cleveland Williams can pack on 20lbs of muscle naturally? NOPE No he could not lol at around 240bs he'd be as dwarfing some versions of Arnold he’d way bigger then Arnold in "Stay Hungry" where AS was 210lbs 6ft thereabouts - A guy off season with Olympia Genes and a lowered dose of juice... in Conan he was around 220lbs at a similar BF % Williams is already sus and adding 20lbs of muscle is never happening.
No, it's not. But it is partially a Liston's diminutive opponents vs today's massive modern heavies thread. Peace.
I'm not saying he couldn't--just that he would be effective stepping into the ring against guys that are taller and heavier than that.
Just an observation here.....Moore was 188 pounds when Marciano defeated him, by the standards of 1955, he was a heavyweight. However, that doesn't stop people from calling him a blown up light heavyweight. So if he was a blown up light heavyweight when he fought Rocky Marciano, he was a blown up light heavyweight when he beat the above named men. If he was a heavyweight when he beat the above named men, then he was a heavyweight when Marciano beat him. Heavyweight, blown up light heavyweight, I'm just asking for consistency.
Let's make this real obvious. Here is Liston's consensus top ten wins, according to the community: https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/sonny-listons-top-ten-wins.731765/ Patterson- 6'0", 189 Patterson- 6'0", 194 Foley- 6'1",198.5, Machen- 6'0", 196, Williams- 6'2", 215.5 Willlams- 6'2", 210, Valdez- 6'3", 211, Harris- 6'0", 195, Clark- 6'3", 215 DeJohn- 6'2.5", 202 Here are Ring Magazine current top Ten heavies... Usyk- 6'3", 226 Fury- 6'9", 281 Dubois- 6'5", 248 Parker- 6'4", 267 Kabayel- 6'3", 241 Joshua- 6'6", 252 Hrgovic- 6'6"- 250 Wardly- 6'5", 243 Zhang- 6'6", 287 Bakole- 6'6", 299 This is not hard to understand. It is not controversial. It is not refutable. IF SIZE IS A FACTOR, LISTON'S COMPETITION SUFFERS. Think of some of the absurd mental gymnastics we have heard, here... 1. Guys like Chuck Wepner and Gerhard Zeck help to show that Liston could have handled modern heavies (can we site someone of quality, here...nope!). 2. A modern heavy is anything 200 pounds or over (it literally isn't in two federations, and Liston's four best wouldn't qualify). 3. It doesn't matter because Sonny hit like a truck (and Marciano didn't?). 4. Cleveland Williams could have put on weight (he'd still be 6'2", right? And he was 210-215 when he fought Liston, so...). Enough is enough. Time for some of you guys to look in the mirror. Does absolute size matter, or do we judge fighters by THE STANDARDS OF THEIR OWN TIME?
I'm of the school of thought that we have to take fighters as they actually existed, not how they could be. One could say that if Marciano were fighting today, he'd be a 215-220 pound Mike Tyson like fighter, except with a much higher work rate. Or that Floyd Patterson would be fighting as a super middleweight/light heavyweight as with same day weigh ins, he was 182 when he won the title, so with day before weigh ins, he could easily have made 168 pounds. He was 190 pounds when he regained the title, so with day before weigh ins, it's not unreasonable to see him making 175 pounds. But taking him as he was, he was a 190 pound heavyweight in the ring.
I agree with this 100 percent. That said, one cannot say that Moore was a blown up light heavyweight when Marciano beat him, but suddenly he becomes a "real heavyweight" when he beat Liston’s victims or people who beat Liston’s victims. If Moore was a blown up light heavyweight when he was stopped by Marciano, if he was a blown up light heavyweight when he dropped Marciano then he was always a blown up light heavyweight. Even when he was beating younger versions of men Liston would later beat or when he was beating men who beat Liston’s opponents. But if Moore was always a real heavyweight, he is still a real heavyweight when he fought Marciano (unless he came in the ring at 175 or less). Same goes for Ezzard Charles.
If he roids up (provided he isn’t already on them) it was the 60s not the 30s lol I don’t see why he couldn’t push himself up 20lbs a solid mix of fat, water, muscle etc.