Rate these 5 domestic dust-ups in the order you'd most like to see them?

I can see why Khan didn't take the Brook fight (thinks he might lose, rules him out of the Floyd payday), but I'm still perplexed why Frampton didn't take the Quigg fight :huh

 

Evening champ.

My issue with doing DeGale and Froch now is it doesn't feel quite big enough yet for a torch passing- and I think DeGale would probably win at this stage. And if Froch wins it might set DeGale back a lot.

I would be up for it if DeGale beat Dirrell and Goves beat Jack, then DeGale won a unification.

 

Even if Khan thinks he will win (and in fairness to him, I do think he believes that), unlike pillow fisted Alexander and Algieri, Khan knows there is a chance he could lose.

However unlike Frampton- Quigg, I do think Khan-Brook can get bigger. Despite what people think it's not at Froch-Groves II.

I still think Brook needs to build his profile a bit more, and somewhat unfairly Khan is more recognised amongst casuals for his failures than his successes.

What I would've done if I was his managment, rather than Algieri, I would've pushed harder to get hype job Broner in the ring. In the build up Khan would probably drum up a bit of support being the lesser of two evils and he'd make a lot of fans when he spanks Broner's overrated ass.

 

Yeah. And Rocky Fielding and Callum Smith are no 1 and 2 to fight for the vacant British title, Smith is like number 3 in the WBC rankings, so if DeGale and Groves do the business I think those titles will be staying in Britain for the foreseeable future with or without Froch. :happy