Rate these guys in order: Mosley, Marquez, Pacquiao, de la hoya?

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/De+la+Hoya+vs+Pacquiao+-+a+weird+possibility.-a0178808336

Read em and weep dumbass learn boxing pac****

 

The second fight was 2002... Barrera beat an undefeated Morales in 2002... watching fights on YouTube doesn't tell you the whole story now does it?:think

 

Golovkin Vs. Canelo at 155 is a CATCHWEIGHT FIGHT, NOT a MIDDLEWEIGHT FIGHT. Kill yourself, Drenloser!

:rofl

 

Be beat him again in 2004 in dominant fashion unlike the first time which was controversial. That's his greatest performance when he whipped Erik Morales in 2004.

 

Byline: Rolando Fuertes*

Oscar de la Hoya versus Manny Pacquiao? A match-up between the two ring gladiators is being tossed around. In fact, the Internet has been buzzing about it lately. Obviously, the probability of such a fight taking place is a juicy storyline.*

It's hard to fathom but De la Hoya himself has sounded off the possibility.*

Owner of nine world titles in six different weight divisions, De la Hoya plans to get two to three more fights before hanging up his gloves. And he wants to move down to the welterweight division where the weight limit is 147 pounds and where he once ruled.*

Pacquiao is the top prizefighter at 130 lbs and generally ranked second on the pound-for-pound list.*

For the fight to take place, Pacquiao and De la Hoya would have to agree on a catch-weight, say, 147 lbs, according to proponents of this fight.*

Well, it sounds so entertaining but a De la Hoya-Pacquiao showdown doesn't make sense to me.



BUH, BUH, BUH, BUH, BUH.....

 

Nah, his greatest performances were Hamed and Morales 2...

 

This dude is just as misinformed as you are!

:rofl:roflatsch

 

How is Morales 2 better than Morales 3 when many people though he lost Morales 2?

WTF?

 

Nah it's just you're new to boxing humpty dumpty:rofl

 

That's surely a typo?

 

Because Morales 2 was a prime Morales..if you're saying this you must think Morales won the first two, so really in reality there should have never been a third fight then right? And you're bragging about what he did in the 3rd fight...:verysad

 

You would think. But I think he's so far dug in now that he'd rather continue to look clueless than admit that he'd got an agenda.

 

Nope...

 

Morales best win came after the Barrera trilogy.

 

Ask anyone if on here like IB or CST80, or any body with a boxing brain, and they'd say a win over Morales in the rematch was probably better than the win over Morales 3.... Make a poll about doughboy..