Rate these guys in terms of greatness and h2h

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Aug 11, 2020.


  1. TipNom

    TipNom Active Member Full Member

    1,456
    3,004
    Jun 19, 2019
    Yes. But although they were the best at the time, I don't rank them as highly p4p as I do Charles, Moore, Hopkins, Toney, Qawi and Holmes
     
  2. WAR01

    WAR01 In the 7.2% Full Member

    1,776
    1,540
    Aug 19, 2019
    Khaosai Galaxy
     
  3. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Fitz still beat a lot of P4P greats like Dempsey, Hall or O'Brien. I don't know, I view Fitzsimmons resume as simply deeper and better.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,893
    44,684
    Apr 27, 2005
    That has nothing to do with H2H at 175.

    Fosters struggles at heavyweight are taken out of context and i think it's time i did a thread on it.

    You talk about his advantages at 175 and he would have them in spades against a guy like Fitz.

    Fitz was routinely weighing sub 160 as a fully grown man. He just wasn't that big. Foster would tower over him and have loads more reach against a much naturally smaller man.

    Imagine Foster against guys like Jim Hall.

    Yeah yeah Fitz won the heavyweight title etc etc. It really doesn't say much for the heavyweights of the era lets be honest.

    Fitz was a giant of his era and he is very likely a top 10 all time great for his achievements in his own era. It was a different world then and he would be very lucky to win a single fight here. Foster would near kill him.
     
    mark ant, Bujia, Bokaj and 1 other person like this.
  5. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Nobody asked here to rank them at LHW, so I assumed to rank them P4P.
    I don't think so, it's not like he only lost to Ali or Frazier.
    Yeah, he's taller and rangier. He's not more powerful though and he's less durable.
    Fitz usually weighed around 170 lbs during his HW campaign. Foster is taller and rangier, but would he be that much bigger?
    Besides, Fitzsimmons fought and beat bigger men than Foster.
    I don't get it - Hall wasn't that small and he was very good. What do you mean?
    Or it says a lot about Fitzsimmons.
    Fitzsimmons could kill Foster as well. He did that to bigger and better fighters than Foster.
     
  6. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Would you tell me which murderous hitter Foster beat to see how he fared against the best punchers?

    Fitzsimmons beat Maher, Sharkey, Gardner, Hall, Choynski, Creedon and he slugged with 220 lbs Jeffries for 8 and 10 rounds. He was stopped only 3 times (twice by Jeffries) in 1890-1906 period, despite facing the best competition possible across three divisions.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,893
    44,684
    Apr 27, 2005
    And there's that lack of career context. It's an easy out and one many seem to swallow. What career stage was Foster at agaisnt these other guys? How many fights had he had? Where were they ranked? where was he ranked? What heavyweights did he lose to once he hit his prime?

    I reckon he is more powerful and i'm far from convinced he is less durable. Fosters terrifying power is there for all to see over and over again.

    Beefed up to 170. You yourself made the point of being bigger.

    Your comment was this - "He was usually much bigger man in the ring (not in terms of weight but height and reach)"

    He would have 3 1/2" of height on Fitz and 7 1/2" of reach. He also has one of the greatest jabs in the history of boxing. A good jab was almost non existent back in Fitz's day.

    I am not misled by the big men Fitz beat because i really don't think they were that good. Corbett was sub 190 pounds. I'm not one bit convinced Foster wouldn't have beaten these guys. I'm also not even convinced Fitz would beat the lesser heavyweights Foster lost to. I'd take Terrell in a heartbeat, absolutely i would.

    Hall was a middleweight and did win one of their fights.

    I've seen enough on film so no.

    I'd argue other. Greater but not necessarily better. Fosters jab would be like the second coming.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,893
    44,684
    Apr 27, 2005
    H2H i really don't rate these guys like you do. Not even close. Put them in Fosters era and see how they go. A Frazier would go thru the lot of them like a hot knife thru butter.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  9. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Then there is no reason to discuss further. We clearly disagree on the quality of Fitz era.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,893
    44,684
    Apr 27, 2005
    Indeed we do.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,565
    21,930
    Sep 15, 2009
    Ok these are my thoughts now. Thanks for the replies thus far. In case anyone didn't clock on its a thinly veiled guise to my reconsidering how good a fighter Patterson was, inspired by an article I read by Iron Mike last month.

    Greatness:
    Fitzsimmons
    Charles
    Langford
    Moore
    Jones Jr
    Spinks
    Patterson
    Tunney
    Foster
    Bivins

    My H2Hist is actually identical also.
     
    70sFan865 likes this.
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Charles would have done well v Frazier.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    They never had a jab like Foster`s.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,893
    44,684
    Apr 27, 2005
    Not convinced. He was an extremely good heavyweight tho so mayyyyyybe he'd go ok for a while. The top flight heavies he faced were smaller men than Frazier.
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    I personally don't see this. I think it's very hard to spot 20 lbs to a guy like Joe and do well against him. Marciano would probably be the exception here, since his strength and power were somewhat freakish for his size.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.