Ray Arcel on Hagler - Hearns.

This is the post where you wrote I said Duran is a top 10 atg. You have lied YET AGAIN.

 

Look at your previous post that I posted. You are a liar. Period.

 

There are two sides to this. I don't mind the interaction since you got personal, yet I don't enjoy putting you down and say you are delusional since I don't know you. I cannot say for sure, but on this topic and thread on a boxing message board it seems like this is a little delusional-certainly unhealthy.

 

Actually you seem to care a lot about what I say. Not really the marking of a self aware person.. To be honest. You mentioned this self aware thing about someone you don't know, so I am just bringing it up. Your whole attitude here is very negative and not too healthy and ego motivated it seems. I cannot make too many assumptions about you except what you are demonstrating here with these comments.. I know the feeling is that it is not too positive on your part. Self aware? I can safely say you are not really self aware. Not with this attitude, unless you are trolling or whatever expression people use for that.

 

Hearns himself said that Hagler rushed in and forced the hit man to defend himself. Broke his hand and really struggled with trying to stay away.

 

That is true. Hearns always said Marvin rushed in and I had to defend myself. Although Hearns was ready to uncork that right hand. He was ready to go and so was Marvin.. It was rare situation where two legends and elite fighters threw caution to the wind and went for it. If Canelo and GGG did that we would have a quick fight but a great one and no one would argue, and Canelo and GGG would be remembered. But it takes a lot of guts to come out like that and take that chance. A lot of confidence. I am not sure either guy would do that. It takes a special situation to get guys to throw punches like that and Hearns knocking out Duran gave him confidence to do that. I think without the knockout of Duran, that first round would not have been like that. Tommy believed in his right hand after the Duran fight. Yet Tommy breaking his hand hurt him. I also think that Marvin coming out righty would have been better for Tommy because he would have been able to punch him to the side rather than straight on which put more pressure on Hearns hand, and made that punch he landed which broke it more awkwardly. Although I must say by round 3 and people have issue with his, Marvin was tired in round 3, but no one notices as much because of how tired Hearns was. But Hagler was missing his punches at Hearns, and after Steele stopped for the ref to look at the cut, then Marvin came up with the energy to land two more clean punches. It is odd how that cut was created by Hearns mouthpiece. It was inadvertent.

 

You are a liar mag. You have lied several times on this thread alone. Liar. You.

 

It would never have gotten personal if you simply had not lied on several occasions, liar.

 

You sure have a high intellect. I admire that immensely.
And when did I lie about boxing content and facts on here? And don't bring up the mag1965 thing. That is none of your business at all. I would and will do that again and again. Maybe I was not him maybe I was. Who cares. It is a boxing message board where we talk about boxing. Contact eastside boxing and find out from them why they kicked me off. They gave me no explanation why I was kicked off, and I owe no one here any explanation why I made another name or didn't admit to being mag. The rules were they didn't have to explain to me why they kicked me off, and I don't have to explain who I am. There was nothing personal either way.


Honestly I do think this is a reflection of how you are more than anything about me. So get personal.
I will respond since this site notifies me when someone quotes me and then responds. I will always respond whether it is about this liar stuff or Thomas Hearns.
And you talk about liar over and over, I don't think someone who is sure of themselves as a person would act like this. There is a flaw in your character which is very evident here.But that is not my concern.
Actually, you talked about self awareness one day and it was ironic. I thought, boy this guy is the most unselfaware person I have heard.
I think your concern here has to do with yourself and maybe your lack of self awareness or your lack of confidence in your own motives and honesty. It is obvious.

 

And you really are the opposite of someone who is self aware. Do you know what self awareness is?
If you did have even a fraction of self awareness, you would know how irrational you sound talking to someone on a boxing message board who you don't know and being all concerned about him.It is a waste of time for me to keep responding to this, but when someone on the board responds to me in a quote I always feel obligated to respond.

 

And yet you keep responding you liar

 

Well you got caught in a lie and then tried to side step it, liar

 

I said I would always respond. Always. If you direct something to me in a quote on this boxing forum.

 

I didn't sidestep anything. I don't/didn't really care what some random person thinks, but I always respond to quotes. You tried to use one thing first and then another to discredit me and both fell short and you are not admitting to being underhanded yourself, which is the opposite of "self aware". I think you know that deep down you are the dishonest one and I am not. Which is what is obvious Mr. Self Aware.