Ray Leonard: Best Fighter of the 80's?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Feb 9, 2013.


  1. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    Leonard was the second man to make Duran lose.
    He has a win over Hagler
    A win over Hearns.

    Duran has the best win of the 80s.

    Mike Tyson has some dominations over relatively bums.
    Then again, Tyson dominated a lot of them while Leonard doesn't have that much quantity wise.
     
  2. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,513
    Sep 16, 2012
    Tyson transcended boxing in the 80s while Leonard had no where near the impact.

    And lets not forget how prolific Mike was. He didn't need catchweights and cheap ploys win his fights either.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    Against ranked opposition he probably rivals Tyson, and at different weights as well: Green, Bond, Finch, Kalule and Lalonde. Add Duran, Hagler and Hearns to that.
     
  4. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    Tyson got more attention because he was more exciting to watch for the casuals and he was a heavyweight.
    "transcending" has nothing to do with being the best or technically a better boxer or beating better men, if that were to be true there would be a Ricardo López statue inside Mexcico-city.

    Being popular means nothing.


    Also ofcourse Tyson didn't need catchweights when he was bigger than most of his opponents (Up to including Spinks he outweighted more than 60% of his opponents.
    (Yes, Tyson didn't have height or reach advantages but his style wouldn't really favour a tall fighter. Ducking under jabs is a bit more difficult being taller, also being higher means your blood has to be pumped higher (Meaning less stamina, which his style really needed) and relatively more bones mass leaving less weight for muscles, shorter arms also give quicker less telegraphed hooks, combined with his great footspeed we had a fighter that didn't have many physical disadvantages up to including the Spinks fight (last fight in his prime))
     
  5. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009

    thanks
     
  6. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    I am not going to defend Leonard, but there was no denying he was huge in the 80s.

    In the UK, I remember Leonard/Hagler being shown delayed prime time on weekday evening TV, while Tyson was 'merely' shown on a Sunday morning...

    And as for 'cheap ploys'; Tyson was King. He 'jumped the shark' post Spinks, and his popularity became more from the human desire to stare at the car crash, than to watch him in the ring.
     
  7. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,513
    Sep 16, 2012
    lol go to a remote village and ask about Tyson and people will know about him

    then ask about Leonard and find out how many know who he is

    Undisputed heavyweight champion who was the biggest star in boxing history next to Ali vs. Leonard who didn't even fight for the majority of the 80s due to injury.

    Shortly after a year he was the biggest name in boxing and by 87 or 88 he was the biggest name in sports, bar none.
     
  8. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,027
    5,353
    Aug 19, 2010
  9. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,568
    3,760
    May 4, 2012
    Tyson fans are crazy at times :yep
     
  10. BoxingFanPhil

    BoxingFanPhil Member Full Member

    330
    2
    Jan 29, 2013
    In the 1980s Tyson was so dominant and his brilliance shone so brightly he redefined heavyweight boxing, he made people pause to contemplate if he was the greatest ever heavyweight fighter. Doesn't matter if you think that for that period Tyson was or was not the greatest fighting machine ever conceived of - you've had that conversation. The fighter of the 1980s was Mike Tyson. There was a fleeting genius that passed through him. When Pete Sampras dominate tennis he said that the truly great performances didn't come from him - they came from 'the gift' - and when he was in touch with the gift he was tennis and not Pete Sampras. With Tyson, for that period, when his genius was burning intensely, he was compelling, he was bewitching, you couldn't take your eyes off him and you couldn't imagine anyone withstanding him.

    As good as as anyone else was in the 1980s, I never felt that way about anyone other than Mike Tyson.
     
  11. BoxingFanPhil

    BoxingFanPhil Member Full Member

    330
    2
    Jan 29, 2013
    And by the way, I'm no Mike Tyson super-fan either. I'm just doing my best to say it how it felt at that time, for me.
     
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,424
    Aug 22, 2004

    But does this make him the best fighter of the decade? He has nothing like a Duran or Hearns or Hagler on his resume. Nothing even close to it, nor did he have the all-round skillset of Leonard.
     
  13. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Julio Cesar Chavez should rank with Sanchez. At least.
     
  14. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,513
    Sep 16, 2012

    This

    Tyson was operating on a different level in the 80s and hardly even lost a round. There was simply no one there to compete with him and no telling what he was capable of.

    Tyson was as skilled if not more skilled than Leonard. Did Leonard have the defense that Mike had? Tyson was never out boxed by anyone in the 80s ... Hearns was able to out box Leonard and so was Duran.

    Tyson was the most skilled heavyweight during that time frame and he didn't rely on smoke and mirrors like Leonard.
     
  15. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,568
    3,760
    May 4, 2012
    If anything that just points to overration.