Ray Mercer V Razor Ruddock

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by crippet, Jan 31, 2008.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    Eh, not sure if Ruddock could crack that chin. A full steam, on the button Morrison couldn't even begin too.
     
  2. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Ruddock was such an infuriating fighter to watch.
    He had all the tools to be a heavyweight champion, and possibly even a very good one - ample size and strength, monstrous power, good boxing fundamentals and the heart of a lion.
    What he lacked was a brain, and I'm only half-joking.

    When he started to believe in his power, he became a one-dimensional plodder, always looking for that big left hand. It cost him badly in the Tyson fights and to a lesser extent in the Morrison fight.


    Mercer I think, was not nearly as blessed when it came to physical gifts. He was never really any better than above-average as a boxer, but that granite chin allowed him to win fights he really should have lost.
    He had good but not pulverising power, did not possess quick hands or feet, had limited endurance and was not much of a thinker in the ring.

    On the face of it, if Ruddock had any kind of strategy and fully employed his considerable arsenal, I think he beats Mercer comforably on points.
    Thing is, he'll try and be macho and it would cost him. Ray would absorb the punches and get in his own, and to me this would become a war of attrition.
    Mercer rarely lost those and I think he'd overcome a knockdown to win on a split decision.
     
  3. ozziebattler

    ozziebattler Shadow Boxer Full Member

    6,657
    2
    Feb 4, 2006
    I actually believe Mercer won the lewis bout.

    Mercer in his prime was a very good boxer with unbelievable heart/chin.

    The poor ******* has become a sideshow these days.

    Any1 see the Kimbo slice farce???It was pumped up as the mma fight of the century and then Kimbo goes for a chokehold.

    Couldnt believe a guy that made his name beating up bums in backyard fist fights(most fights he stands there and lets his opponents hit him)
    to show they got nothing.But against Mercer he goes for a takedown then chokehold.

    I know this has nothing to do with this thread but it just shits me how big bad Kimbo **** talked up a big slugfest then delivers a chokehold.

    Mercer would of owned that fool if they traded punches toe 2 toe.
     
  4. ozziebattler

    ozziebattler Shadow Boxer Full Member

    6,657
    2
    Feb 4, 2006
    Totally agree with your post.

    Ruddock was a decent fighter who definetly had it all to be a good world titlelist(2many belts).

    Also if you rewatch the Morrison v Mercer bout you will see how good mercer's chin is.The bloke took massive shots and was easily getting outhustled until his opponent left a opening and wham he was merciless.

    Both Mercer and Ruddock were extremely good fighters who if in their prime these days would probably be holding titles.
     
  5. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    I agree with you here. Ruddock dissapointed a lot of his fans against Tyson, Lewis and Morrison because he was always looking for the one big shot from that hybrid left hook-uppercut. Why he didn't box and use the jab that gave him his nickname is beyond me. I don't know what happened between Ruddock and Floyd Patterson but he was looking good for a while when Floyd got him throwing more combinations.
     
  6. bxrfan

    bxrfan Sizzle Full Member

    3,061
    16
    Sep 28, 2007
    Both were inconsistant, but I'd say that Ray Mercer wins a decision.