Ray Robinson Jan 1, 1955 to Dec 31 1960?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ripcity, Jan 31, 2012.


  1. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I do you have to take care of your self to secude at that age Robinson took care of himself, Leonard didn't.
     
  2. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    nah he was only 36, by your standards you accountable until 39, Benny got dominated easily like a amatuer, so looks like he was overrated too thanks for enlightening me.
     
  3. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Are Brett Favre, Dan Marino and Peyton Manning better quarterbacks than Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw?
    The first group is 2-3 in Super Bowls. The second one is 8-0.
    Brett Favre, Dan Marino and Peyton Manning are 1,2,3 in Passing touchdowns and yards.
    Montana is #12 in yards Bradshaw is # 46.
    Montana is # 11 in touchdowns. Bradshaw is # 25.
    Based on talant/abillity alone you have to go with
    Brett Favre, Dan Marino and Peyton Manning. However when you look at the over all picture. You got to go with Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw. Why because they won the big game when they were cappple of doing so. Robinson lost championship fights when he was capple of winning them.
     
  4. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Why do I have to repeat myself?
     
  5. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    Because your points are so stupid, I wanna see if you realise how stupid they are.
     
  6. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    See you're stickin' by your guns, rc. Nobel but means zip.

    All that matters is head-to-head. When SRR was asked about an opponent who scored higher hitting a machine, he replied: "He beat the machine; let's see what he can do with me"

    Sugar flattened him in a round.
     
  7. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    What about when Ralph "Tiger" Jones beat the sh!t out of SRR....now that was a shock.

    No one thought Jones was "capple" of doing that to Robbie.
     
  8. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    To say a boxer is old is no excuse. Robinson was capable of winning those fights. Leonard who had been hand feed creem puffs up to the Jimmy McLarnin fight was no longer capable of winning those fights. Jimmy McLarnin who was two fights away from being a world champion was no cream puff.
    Had Leonard had better management and put him in more chalanging bouts. he may have been in better shape with his 5′ 5″frame and 69" reach Leonard should have been fighting at weight closer to 145 than the 150 he was. At 5′ 11″ and a 72½″could easily handall 160at his age. At 5' 11" and 72" Robinson was more likely malnurshed welterweight than he was a beefed up one fighting as a middleweight. In otherwords while I don't beleve there is anysuch thing as naturalweight if there was 160 would be closer to Robinson's than 147.
    I do belive that Leonard's bad managment put him in a bad spot.
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Which oppoent was this?
    All that matters is head to head? really that's my point. You can have his exbitions, oh excuse me non tittle fights. There is anothe name for them "record stuffers".
    Robinson's talent is not in question. However when it mattered he lost more often than he should have.
     
  10. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    True, L. But what's your point in the BIG PICTURE? An unbelievable career, starting in 1940, battling opponents 'n refusing to knuckle-under to the Mob, who ran the game.

    If one only saw the Jones fight, it would be like the blind man grabbing an elephant's tail, saying: "It must be a snake"
     
  11. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    Did that start after Ray's return -- a shell of his greatness. When he was nothing more than a name on marque -- journeyman for peanuts?
     
  12. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Any thing up to the end of 1960. 14-6-1 was his record in championship fights this includs 2 wins for the Pennsylvania State World Middleweightchampionship.
    At which point was Robinson a shell of him self?

     
  13. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Keep my first response in mind because I'm not backing down from it. Leonard was not the anywhere near what he was. At worst Robinson was very close.
    However Lets say your right based on my oragional statment about aghe Leonard should have beaten Jimmy McLarnin. I give you that. I don't agree. However he should have been in better shape. Bad Magament or not, it was Leonard's responsibility to be in shape. Just like it was Robinson's responsibility to fight smarter. Both men were capable of the tsk in which they failed.
    The thing is It happened to Leonard only once. If you count the Britton fight than that would be twice. It happened to Robinson 7 times
     
  14. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    The Question was: Robinson post 1/1/55-1960.

    Robinson was slightly better than his opposition then, but he was winning & losing in a lot of his key fights. The Ralph "Tiger" Jones fight set the tone for what was to come down the Road....and when the undersized Basiio pushed him around the ring.....you knew then that's all she wrote.
     
  15. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    Frustrating. Is the only way you can talk about an ATG like SRR by parroting BoxREc, rc?

    Would you need Wikipedia to discuss the genius of Michelangelo?

    Yes, Sugar was a shell, as any fighter, trainer 'n gym rat who'd seen him before his retirement would confirm.

    It was a testament to SRR's greatness that he could still win (though taking more 'n more of a pounding 'n slower to pull the trigger) against some elite fighters.