razor ruddock of 1990 vs george foreman of 1990 who wins and why???

Id bet quite a bit on Foreman.

Big George was vunerable to guys that could stick and move and avoid his power. Guys that were elusive. Ruddock didnt have the ring IQ to do this.

Foreman knew how to set up his power shots better than Razor Ruddock. He could time him and most importantly he would stuff that big jab in Razor`s grill over and over. Foreman would catch him wide open and off balance as Ruddock often was.

George Foreman just to smart and experianced to lose to Ruddock. I think he would put Ruddock down a few times before the referee got tired of counting and stopped it.

Foreman TKO 7th

 

Exactly why Foreman would win. Being scared of George Foreman was always a healthy thing. Ruddock would find a way to let George nail him.

 

Ruddock would look like prime Larry Holmes against Foreman.

 

Just like Larry Holmes minus the jab, the righthand,. ring IQ and the boxing skills. Other than that he would be the spitting image of Holmes. :good

 

...my point was that he'd be fighting the same dinosaur who made Tommy Morrison look like Floyd Patterson. And Ruddock had a legit jab anyway, you nitwit.

 

You mean the same Tommy Morrison that KOd Ruddock in 6?

You walked into that one the same way Ruddock would walk into Foreman`s right.

Think out your responses next time....nitwit.

 

Ruddock was actually skilled once... until he fell in love with his power and started relying on his punch.

 

Did he really? Because most people who saw him fight kniow that he fell in love with his power and was a one handed lefthooker.

His jab was ****.

 

Thats true. As a prospect coming up he did have a decent jab. After Smith he never really used it. So it wouldnt be matter.

 

Yes, Tommy Morrison knocked a peaking Razor Ruddock out cold, fair stoppage, and was never in trouble during the fight. That happened.

 

Ruddock couldnt really hurt Tyson or knock him down, and Tyson
****ed Ruddock up. George had a great jab but the chin to eat
smashes all night and the power to stop Ruddock. Foreman
by TKO in an 8 round war. Ruddock had a hell of a chin
but slugging aganst Tyson or Foreman is the way to lose.
Foreman would have timed him with a hookercut

 

Gimme the guy who used his jab, had the better jaw, the composure, and the proven capacity to end what he started when he hurt a guy, or at the very least, pile on the points(When he hurt Stewart, he didn't finish him, but he put him down twice, which was his margin of victory).

Gimme Foreman W12 or TKO10.

 

Ruddock could box, and in 1990 against Foreman, it would soon become obvious to him if he wants to win, that is what he would need to do. And I suspect he probably will and just do enough to edge the decision.