Re-watching Loma-Linares

What do I make him out to be?

 

your comparing De Marco or Linares to Castillo??? Lmfao

 

You didn't answer my question??

 

In relation to the fact that they have losses to lesser fighters yes... I just applied your method of riposte.. Way to **** on your avatar bro.. Remind me who the feck Julio Alvarez is again?? LOL Do you have a problem with your own methodology or something? You think it worth noting that Linares has losses to lesser fighter's.. Well what does it say about JLC (seen as you're a fan) that he lost to the likes of Soto & Alvarez & Jauregui??? You find this stuff pertinent to keep mentioning.. So I'd like consistency.. Nothing has meaning without comparison. Explain..

& thanks for reading & quoting my link citing the ruminations of Rocky Juarez. Always worth a share..

 

You've clearly not seen the fight

 

Yep, you can quarrel with John's resume, but he beat a hall-of famer in his prime, went 48-1-2, and won SEVENTEEN title fights.

 

It was one inch and 6 or 7 lbs. Bro. not exactly Duran- Hagler.

 

You got that backwards, most unbiased posters have scored it for John, seen it more than once John won fair and square and he's not that good.

 

Has a bigger frame than Loma, long reach, taller and naturally heavier.

Yeah log off.

 

Both started at 126. both moved to 130 both moved to 135. Chenko CHOSE to fight at LHWT, because he's a lightweight.

 

I thought John won and I like both guys.

 

He’s naturally larger, it’s not rocket science. Longer reach, bigger frame, denser bones, bigger muscles, naturally heavier, taller.

 

Yeah, by an inch and 6 or 7 lbs.

 

Linares hydrated to 154, Loma 138.

 

6 or 7lb's is huge at their weights. Linares is easily bigger