read this before shooting you mouth

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxon123, Dec 30, 2009.


  1. thesandman51

    thesandman51 teh secks Full Member

    1,221
    0
    Sep 12, 2008
    I think it'll be too hard for Pacquiao and co. to prove that any of those guys KNEW he wasn't on PED's.

    What kind of evidence will they be able to provide?
     
  2. pretty boy

    pretty boy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,621
    2
    Jun 30, 2009
    The only one to say pac was on roids was sr. I dont see pac suing malignaggi. He shud take the test if hes innocent and just take the fight.
     
  3. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    Keith Kizer can testify for Pacquiao's behalf, he has tested clean through out his whole career fighting in Nevada.
     
  4. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    0
    Sep 6, 2009
    why sue malignaggi hes just jumping on the bandwagon tryin to get himself a big payday
     
  5. kflex101

    kflex101 Active Member Full Member

    555
    0
    Aug 15, 2004
    The irony too is that in the same statement where it is claimed they "knew" Pac wasn't using PED's (which of course is impossible to know), Manny's power is put down to the power of god.
    Am I able to sue him for making such stupid allegations about a mythical figure that very likely doesn't exist.
    Manny and Co. are losing the plot, this cause will go nowehere.
     
  6. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
  7. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Its more like Pac who is sweating like the rat that he is.
     
  8. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Yep, they intend to prove some of the statements they make in there? Interesting read, anyhow.
     
  9. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    and USADA reps can show that NSAC's current testing policy is inadequate
     
  10. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008

    rodneys legal team are as we speak drawing up the apropriate documents to sue boxron123 for false allergations that rodney lives in lala land these claims are untry and are a defermation of my clients charector


    signed ............hagman1989

    from the office of stupid legal cases
     
  11. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    2nd best post of the day after your love letter to Arum :lol:
     
  12. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    It will be two commercial companies each claiming their product is superior.
     
  13. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008

    this is what i mean just a pathetic and futile atempt to take the spotlight of his refusal to agree to the terms and sight the contact
     
  14. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Watch how all this pans out.
    Drug screening must be seriously addressed in boxing.
    If not --- someone will eventually get killed because of it.
     
  15. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008

    i was jst making a joke about how poor there case is im just waiting for boxon123s responce