Real boxing fan' vs The Juges

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JM22, Jun 29, 2008.


  1. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    Maybe it sound's silly but who do you perfer to juges fight's us the fan's by vote's or juges cause lot's of juges suck who do you pef.
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    as much as i would like my opinion to matter, judges were trained for the purpose of judging and would just leave to them the scoring of a fight.
     
  3. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Judges because ppl like you would score fights light Cotto vs Margarito in favor of Margarito just because you're a fan of his.
     
  4. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    The judges are at ringside and you fools are watching it streamed thru Sopcast...Id take the judges by a mile
     
  5. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    exactly.
     
  6. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    A vote by the fans would be way too biased. Either because they'd prefer one fighter over the other, or because too many fans allow TV commentating to influence their scoring.
     
  7. Shifty107

    Shifty107 The MARVELOUS ONE! Full Member

    1,124
    0
    Apr 21, 2008
    I love juggs. Big ones, little ones, perky ones and even saggy ones. Ones with big nipples, ones with small arreola's. Woteva shape they come in I love'em. :good
     
  8. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    You know Chimba, I've tried to make this point several times. People don't seem to understand this. They're ringside, and they're watching intently. They also only have one angle. In essence, they're seeing a different fight than people watching on T.V are seeing.
     
  9. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Yet some of this fools also propagate the method of watching it with no sound to see a clear winner (so they can mute the analyst, like the Judges ringside hear them:patsch ) Pure ignorance :lol:

    Yet they forget that the judges ringside not only goes by what they see but also what they hear..whos got more pop.
     
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I watch on high def big screens most of the time. And admit it, there are judges who are absolutely horrible with incredibly bad track records. Like Doug Tucker.....
     
  11. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Well you know whats the genesis of this craziness right?..Its their bias towards a certain fighter, plain and simple..but to carry it as far to insinuate that they can be better judges..cmon...
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    :lol:
     
  13. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    For every Doug Tucker, there are 200 fans watching at home who are even worse.
     
  14. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Of course there are..I just saw Carlos Beltran swung at a slider from Pettite on the dirt. I'l tell you I woudnt have swung on that
     
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    The best are the ones that try to revise history, and take away peoples' wins. What the **** kind of **** is that? Does this happen in any other sport? I don't agree with the pass interference call on Miami against Ohio State in the 2002 National Championship game. However, it would be pretty silly for me to go around claiming that Miami was the 2002 National Champions.