Perhaps I consider it relevant that the reason given untruthful but equally find it unessasary to ply you with the rest of the information. :think
Thought when specifically asked about the real reason behind the Khan/Harrison split previously your response was "can't say" but now you seem to be suggesting you just find it unnecessary to fill us in with the facts. :?
I must say Jeff I don't doubt you are a mans man & proper hard etc but I must say you are acting like one of the gossipy old hags from work discussing what "Sandra from daarn the roads been up ta" in this particular instance.
yeh jeff you have still gotta tell me you know what, and add the khan/harrison stuff in a PM. I WILL ACTUALLY FIGHT YOU IF YOU DONT TELL ME!
Seeing as JT does not want to spill the beans, what has Sandra been up to ? I don't blame JT, if he tells all on the forum the likes of Bunce will be telling all and sundry on one of his shows and then the witch hunt will start, JT will be blamed and no one will tell him anything in the future.
The main point is that the reason SN gave was false.... The truth behind the split is up to someone else to pass on.... You forget- this is me... I am Jeff Thomas (ex) boxer from Blackpool... So if I write something its coming from me not some bogus alias. I'm closer to the game then most of the users on Eastside and have already been warned about passing on titbits on here. I do it so that you guys get a chance to get some information that you normally wouldn't be able to get hold of before a fight and discuss. But somethings are more sensative then others and I use my discretion as to how much info I can pass on. Really you should respect my wishes at not wanting to blurt something out rather then make sly digs. Expected better from you really Elle. Appreciate that.
No problem and some of us did understand why you was not telling everything. Can you tell us after Khan retires.
Disappointed at the tone of your post - particularly the personal and sly dig remarks. Thats not my style towards posters on here. My first post in this thread wasn't addressing you specifically - you chose to quote it and respond. That response seemed a little at odds with what you'd previously said on the matter which was what I picked up on thats all. Although you've suggested the true reason behind the Khan/Harrison split "would make great reading for ESB" I have respected your wishes when you've said you "can't say" and haven't been one of those who has suggested you PM the info through. It certainly wasn't my intention but I've obviously offended you and for that I apologise.
If you notice what I wrote Jeff, it was not to have a pop for you not blurting it out but more just the "I know something you don't know" stance. Plus it was tongue in cheek anyway, hence the " ".:good