No offense dude. But you were definitely being a little passive aggressive tonight, in the RBR anyways.
Well with you I was just messing with you and CST. You guys are my boys. I dont even know who Kirk is, I just remember we had one argument or something a while ago. I mean do you think he was taking shots at me in his first post in this thread or not? He was obviously trying to stir something up with me, and he had a comeback about how I made prediction threads and pretended like I knew boxing ready, so that pretty much says everything. I feel like he's been harboring some hatred for me for a while, and is lashing out .
Kirk is a legend here man! The prediction league is in his namesake after all! IDK anything about his starting **** with you or not, just saying you were a little passive aggressive in the RBR is all.
actually willie monroe gave the blueprint. After he was hurt and knocked down, the next round he stood in the center of the ring and hit GGG with uppercuts and body punches. GGG is ineffective while infighting. That was my first post on the site. Willie Monroe in losing gave us the blueprint to beat GGG. Kell Brook did just that but didn't have the power to get the respect.
I meant like I dont know him as a poster. I know his prediction league, and I know he's a mod, but I don't know him like that. Keep it real man, and stop being a kiss ass. The dude basically took a title from my thread, and labelled people with this mentality "the usual suspects". Then he got all butthurt after I responded with a crying emoji, and started talking **** about the predictions threads I made. This is coming from someone who supposedly barely goes to any of my threads.
I wasnt taking shots at Ellerbe. I was using your thread title as an example of the entire mindset that I knew was going to respond to a thread like this. The 'always knew G was this level and the only reason this fight looked like it did was simply because G fought his best opponent' which is partly true, but doesnt tell the whole story imo. If I wanted to take shots at you I would just quote you more often and call you out on your bs. I dont. It wasnt about 'taking a shot' at you as much as it was using the first thread title I saw to use as the example, from the usual G critics. That all being said. Cool.... I can see how you took offense to it and can even see why you would respond the way you did.
Fair enough, I still think you were indirectly taking shots at me, but whatever. I'd actually far prefer it if you just called me out any post that you consider "bs". Yes sometimes I get caught up arguing with fanboys and say BS, but for the most part I am reasonable.
I don't get what you're on about with this 'golovkins ability, or lack thereof'? He just beat a very very good fighter? Am I missing something here or are people so caught up in the pre fight hype that they're judging golovkins ability in relation to what his nuthuggers say? Golovkin is a great fighter, so is Jacobs.
Tonight, (barring G's cruise control, which I didnt expect) was why I never cared to see that fight or even to see G at 168. I actually thought if he did have success at 168 it would be because he would be outworking people down the stretch I didnt think he would coast like this in close fights. But ya, Ward UD's him all day....
Nah man to be honest with you I dont much care for you at all so just try avoid interacting with you period Using your thread title was my mistake which caused our current interaction so thats my bad. But it was the perfect example of a title and mindset of what I needed. Still I should have worded it better and less insulting.
I didnt get butthurt because of your emoji. I talk to you like that because you annoy the **** out of me whenever I run across your posts... for years. it is what it is.
That's cool, I thought you had something against me hence you tried to take shots in your thread. We can avoid interaction, just remember that you're the one who initiated it by firing shots not me. I never talk to you.