Reason for the delay in Whyte signing the contract

Just ask the staff members to throw this thread in the trash. Fury was given an 80/20 split against Klitschko and fought him. Whyte does not have to recieve 30 percent. It's in the rules dumbass. Stop with this ridiculous narrative that Whytes getting done badly by the WBC. He's been waiting this whole time for a shot right ? It's right in his face. He can sign or not.

Biased piece of sh*t.

 

Yes but...you have to admit Whyte has been shafted by WBC guarding Wilder ( although Imo Wilder would ko him} & now against Fury , it just seems odd & unfair ...

 

Yep here we go.

We all know the real reason why you're supporting Whyte. An unbiased person would see that Whytes the one holding up the cart. Hes getting about 8 million and an about an extra 3 million if he wins the fight i believe. This big payday is right in his face and he's not signing.

 

Tbh I hope whyte gets dumped off now and doesnt get the fury fight, absolute joke!

 

The real reason why Whyte didn't sign the contract is: because Anthony Joshua will not fight Usyk in a rematch and will accept the step aside money. Whyte will also get step aside money, so he didn't sign the contract.

 

Full of life when deontay had the belt wasn't he

This content is protected

 

Genuinely don't think Whyte would have even taken the Wilder fight now either.

 

Wilders team offered Whyte a way in via Ortiz but he turned that down.

 

Pretty sure Fury was given 72-25 based on the reported earnings that came out of the fight. Which would align with the WBO rules.

Not sure where this 80-20 for Fury v Klitschko that keeps getting bandied about on this board has come from.

So basically Fury got what he expected based on the WBO rules.

Whyte is getting less than can be expected based on the WBC rules.

Give it a rest with that nonsense

 

Didn't Arum offer him 25 percent though ?

 

If he doesn't sign this becomes one of the worst ducks in modern boxing history.

 

So? That is still below the minimum 28% a mandatory challenger could expect. Then add 10% to the potential winner.

The only defence of this is that the WBC can ignore their own guidelines and make things up as they go along, because it's their rule book.

Personally I'm not onside with that

Imagine if he ducks, the uproar on here, then arbitration happens next month

 

What if something happens when he goes to Disney Land with his kids in the car?

Are you mad?