you thick *******!!!! **** off and never ever watch another boxing match again please!!! why wasnt floyd weakened? EXACTLY!!...again, **** OFF!!!! :****off
the reason he lost??? There is only one reason... Floyd Mayweather. I hate the fella's attitude at times and the way he puts himself accross to the media but you have to admire his adaptiblity. He was superb last weekend. It's all well and good saying that Mosley is old but to school a champion of Mosley's stature for 11 out of the 12 rounds is a great acheivment.
Well it seems Shane took a blood test day before the fight right before the weigh in and Mayweather didn't. I'm waiting to hear what Shane has to say about this but ****, it's a little shady.
If Shane lost cause of needles then its because he couldnt fight without his precious steroids. People say Shane lost cause of a test no Shane lost cause he didnt wanna get caught with roids so a roidless Shane loses to Floyd. Dont blame a little blood. I think Floyd won cause he was a stylistic nightmare and fought a near perfect fight
The prevailing thought is that they both were weakened and the difference is what each had left in their tanks which is part determined by their age. It's not an earth shattering idea, older people have less in the tank as they age. As much as I want to believe this since I dislike Mayweather, I'm more inclined to believe that Mosley just got hit hard by father time and that he had bad training leading up to the fight. What I can't get my head around is how a supposedly great trainer can send his fighter in to get that outclassed and look to be that out of shape.
Based on Pedro Fernandez's previous articles and his relationship with Victor Conte (SNAC sponsors his show), IMO this is more a shot at Mosley and the testing preventing him from enhancing, NOT Mayweather.
Maybe father time along with Mayweather were too much for him, jeez why are people so surprised that a guy pushing 40 couldn't hang?